Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023148›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Correction to: The production of UL16-binding protein 1 targeted pigs using CRISPR technology.

Joanna Zeyland, Magdalena Hryhorowicz, Agnieszka Nowak-Terpiłowska, Jacek Jura, Ryszard Słomski, Zdzisław Smorąg, Barbara Gajda, Daniel Lipiński

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna Zeyland1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland.
Magdalena Hryhorowicz1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland.
Agnieszka Nowak-Terpiłowska1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland.
Jacek Jura2Department of Animal Reproduction, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.
Ryszard Słomski1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland.
Zdzisław Smorąg2Department of Animal Reproduction, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.
Barbara Gajda2Department of Animal Reproduction, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.
Daniel Lipiński1Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-632 Poznań, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Poznań · PLNational Research Institute of Animal Production · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1107-4.].

Identifiers

PMID30023148
PMCPMC6045559
OpenAlexW2884855237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.