Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023033›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore.

Fernando Fernandez-Llimos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Building Credibility with Comprehensive Citation Practices.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bibliometric Analysis of Granger Causality Studies.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The 50 Most-Cited Papers on Bankart Lesions.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Scientometric Mapping of Scientific Production on COVID-19 and the Practice of Exclusive Breastfeeding.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
  16. Understanding impact factor and citescore.Saudi journal of anaesthesia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fernando Fernandez-LlimosEditor-in-chief, Pharmacy Practice. Institute for Medicines Research (iMed.ULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa. Lisbon (Portugal).ORCID 0000-0002-8529-9595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two major journal-based metrics are in competition: the Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. Although these two metrics are based on similar principles of measuring the impact by citations, some differences between them exist. Years used to calculate the metric, access to computing data, and number of journals covered are some of these differences. One of the most relevant differences for pharmacy journals is the recognition in CiteScore of Pharmacy as an independent Subject Area, whereas it appears to have merged with pharmacology in the Journal Citation Reports. The immediate consequence of this differentiation is that pharmacy journals remain in the third and fourth quartiles in the Journal Impact Factor distribution, while a true quartile distribution exists in CiteScore.

Indexed as

BibliographicDatabasesJournal Impact FactorPeriodicals as TopicPharmacyPublication Bias

Identifiers

PMID30023033
PMCPMC6041207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.