Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023022›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies in Jordan: a public survey.

Tareq L Mukattash, Nour H Bazzi, Khawla Q Nuseir, Anan S Jarab, Rana K Abu-Farha, Maher R Khdour

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Audit on Pharmacists' Knowledge and Experience in Pediatric Care.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Act like a warrior to defeat medication counselling barriers: A cross sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tareq L MukattashDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Irbid (Jordan). tlmukattash@just.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0003-0200-9845
Nour H BazziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Irbid (Jordan). noor_bazzi@yahoo.com.
Khawla Q NuseirDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Irbid (Jordan). kqnuseir@just.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-1696-247X
Anan S JarabDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology. Irbid (Jordan). asjarab@just.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-506X
Rana K Abu-FarhaDepartment of Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University. Amman (Jordan). r_abufarha@asu.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-4071
Maher R KhdourFaculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University. Jerusalem (Palestine). maher.khdour@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0193-7922
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOAl-Quds University · PSApplied Science Private University · JOUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to assess the views and attitudes of the general public towards the current role of pharmacists in Jordan.

methodsThis study is a cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire-based study. After a thorough literature review on public perspectives of pharmaceutical care services, a draft questionnaire was designed. This questionnaire was examined and discussed in a focus group of invited public members and was amended accordingly to reach the final draft. The questionnaire was administered using a structured interview technique in which members of the public were asked a series of questions by a trained pharmacist. The study took a place over a period of six months, from January to June 2013. Individuals were recruited from urban and rural areas of Jordan.

resultsA total of 1214 respondents were interviewed during the study. Of the respondents, 67.8% were female. Most of the respondent were married (64%) and had a university degree (88.5%). Approximately half of the respondents (55.1%) had no previous knowledge of pharmaceutical care. A relative majority of respondents considered the most important activity performed by pharmacists to be dispensing medications (46.2%), followed by patient counseling (34.6%). The majority of respondents (86.4%) believed that pharmacists have a role in providing healthcare services, and 68% of respondents reported that in order to serve their needs, a pharmacist must consider the patient's needs and engage patients in determining medication timing and options.

conclusionsThe plurality of respondents believed in the importance of pharmacists in providing pharmaceutical care services. However, respondents expected much from pharmacists and felt that their current role was unsatisfying.

Indexed as

AttitudesCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHealth KnowledgeJordanPharmaciesPharmacistsPracticeProfessional PracticeProfessional RoleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30023022
PMCPMC6041206
OpenAlexW2809587084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.