Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023007›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2018

Dancing with the DNA damage response: next-generation anti-cancer therapeutic strategies.

Anna Minchom, Caterina Aversa, Juanita Lopez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Radiation-induced rhinosinusitis: Mechanism research and clinical progress review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. DNA Damage and Its Role in Cancer Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MinchomDrug Development Unit at Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-7101
Caterina AversaDrug Development Unit at Royal Marsden Hospital/ Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Juanita LopezDrug Development Unit at Royal Marsden Hospital/Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Rd, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of genomic stability is a critical determinant of cell survival and relies on the coordinated action of the DNA damage response (DDR), which orchestrates a network of cellular processes, including DNA replication, DNA repair and cell-cycle progression. In cancer, the critical balance between the loss of genomic stability in malignant cells and the DDR provides exciting therapeutic opportunities. Drugs targeting DDR pathways taking advantage of clinical synthetic lethality have already shown therapeutic benefit - for example, the PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown benefit in

Indexed as

DNA damage responseimmunotherapyPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30023007
PMCPMC6047242
OpenAlexW2883507417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.