Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018

Mouse Model Established by Early Renal Transplantation After Skin Allograft Sensitization Mimics Clinical Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

Daqiang Zhao, Tao Liao, Siwen Li, Yannan Zhang, Haofeng Zheng, Jing Zhou, Fei Han, Yu Dong, Qiquan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal models for transplant immunology: bridging bench to bedside.Clinical transplantation and research · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Organ Donor Pretreatment With Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in a Murine Model of Allogenic Kidney Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daqiang ZhaoDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao LiaoDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Siwen LiDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yannan ZhangDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Haofeng ZhengDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fei HanDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu DongDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiquan SunDivision of Kidney Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the main barrier to renal graft survival, and mouse renal AMR models are important to study this process. Current mouse models are established by priming the recipient to donor skin for over 7 days before kidney transplantation. The robustness of AMR in these cases is too strong to mimic clinical AMR and it is unclear why altering the priming times ranging from 7 to 91 days fails to reduce the AMR potency in these models. In the present study, we found that the donor-recipient combination and skin graft size were determinants of donor-specific antibody (DSA) development patterns after skin transplantation. DSA-IgG was sustained for over 100 days after skin challenge, accounting for an identical AMR robustness upon different skin priming times over 7 days. However, decreasing the skin priming time within 7 days attenuated the robustness of subsequent renal allograft AMR in C3H to Balb/c mice. Four-day skin priming guaranteed that recipients develop acute renal AMR mixed with a high ratio of graft-infiltrating macrophages, renal grafts survived for a mean of 6.4 ± 2.1 days, characterized by typical AMR histological changes, such as glomerulitis, peritubular capillary (PTC) dilation, and capillaritis, deposition of IgG and C3d in PTCs, but less prevalence of microthrombus, whereas the cellular rejection histological change of tubulitis was absent to mild. With this scheme, we also found that the renal AMR model can be developed using common mouse strains such as C57BL/6 and Balb/c, with mean prolonged renal graft survival times of 14.4 ± 5.0 days. Finally, we proved that donor-matched skin challenge after kidney transplantation did not strongly affect DSA development and kidney graft outcome. These findings may facilitate an understanding and establishment of mouse renal allograft AMR models and promote AMR-associated studies.

Indexed as

animal modelantibody-mediated rejectiondonor-specific antibodykidney transplantationmice

Identifiers

PMID30022978
PMCPMC6039569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.