Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022953›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2018

Physiological Differences Between Low Versus High Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophic Responders to Resistance Exercise Training: Current Perspectives and Future Research Directions.

Michael D Roberts, Cody T Haun, Christopher B Mobley, Petey W Mumford, Matthew A Romero, Paul A Roberson, Christopher G Vann, John J McCarthy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D RobertsSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Cody T HaunSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Christopher B MobleySchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Petey W MumfordSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Matthew A RomeroSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Paul A RobersonSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Christopher G VannSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
John J McCarthyDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.
Auburn University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous reports suggest there are low and high skeletal muscle hypertrophic responders following weeks to months of structured resistance exercise training (referred to as low and high responders herein). Specifically, divergent alterations in muscle fiber cross sectional area (fCSA), vastus lateralis thickness, and whole body lean tissue mass have been shown to occur in high versus low responders. Differential responses in ribosome biogenesis and subsequent protein synthetic rates during training seemingly explain some of this individual variation in humans, and mechanistic

Indexed as

androgen receptorhypertrophyIGF-1microRNAsribosome biogenesissatellite cells

Identifiers

PMID30022953
PMCPMC6039846
OpenAlexW2808102275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.