Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022931›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2018

A Translational Framework of Educational Neuroscience in Learning Disorders.

Thomas Dresler, Stephanie Bugden, Camilo Gouet, Marie Lallier, Darlene G Oliveira, Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas, Ana C Pires, Yunqi Wang, Camila Zugarramurdi, Janaina Weissheimer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas DreslerLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephanie BugdenDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Camilo GouetLaboratorio de Neurociencias Cognitivas, Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Marie LallierBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastián, Spain.
Darlene G OliveiraInstituto Presbiteriano Mackenzie, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Pinheiro-ChagasCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.
Ana C PiresCentro de Investigación Básica en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Yunqi WangSchool of International Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Camila ZugarramurdiBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastián, Spain.
Janaina WeissheimerBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging has undergone enormous progress during the last two and a half decades. The combination of neuroscientific methods and educational practice has become a focus of interdisciplinary research in order to answer more applied questions. In this realm, conditions that hamper learning success and have deleterious effects in the population - such as learning disorders (LD) - could especially profit from neuroimaging findings. At the moment, however, there is an ongoing debate about how far neuroscientific research can go to inform the practical work in educational settings. Here, we put forward a theoretical translational framework as a method of conducting neuroimaging and bridging it to education, with a main focus on dyscalculia and dyslexia. Our work seeks to represent a theoretical but mainly empirical guide on the benefits of neuroimaging, which can help people working with different aspects of LD, who need to act collaboratively to reach the full potential of neuroimaging. We provide possible ideas regarding how neuroimaging can inform LD at different levels within our multidirectional framework, i.e., mechanisms, diagnosis/prognosis, training/intervention, and community/education. In addition, we discuss methodological, conceptual, and structural limitations that need to be addressed by future research.

Indexed as

dyscalculiadyslexiaeducationlearning disordersneuroimagingtranslational framework

Identifiers

PMID30022931
PMCPMC6039789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.