ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018
Overexpression of DJ-1 correlates with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and poor prognosis in malignant tumors: a meta-analysis.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA number of studies have investigated the role of DJ-1 in the development and progression of malignant tumors. This meta-analysis aims to systematically estimate the rela-tionship between the expression level of DJ-1 and the malignant biological behaviors of tumors and to assess the clinical significances of DJ-1 in the prognosis and diagnosis of cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with their 95% confidence interval and the diagnostic value of DJ-1 were calculated.
resultsFourteen eligible studies with a total of 1,947 subjects were enrolled in our meta-analysis. The results showed that DJ-1 was overexpressed in cancer patients compared with noncancer patients (OR = 30.72), and elevated expression of DJ-1 was demonstrated to be closely associated with high tumor-node-metastasis stage (OR = 5.52), poor differentiated degree (OR = 2.46), positive lymph node metastasis (OR = 4.12) and worse overall survival (HR = 2.23). In addition, the combined sensitivity and specificity for DJ-1 to discern malignant tumors were 0.73 and 0.93, respectively. The diagnostic OR was 34.87, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88.
conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated that DJ-1 was an important biomarker in tumor assessment and prognosis prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.