Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2018
Development and validation of a predictive model to identify patients at risk of severe COPD exacerbations using administrative claims data.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional meta-analysis of risk and comorbidity burden.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic risk factors for moderate-to-severe exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review.Respiratory research · 2022Pooled it
- Short-term prediction of COPD exacerbations based on wearable vital sign monitoring.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Prognostic Models for Disease Progression and Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Emulating randomized trials by observational database studies: the RCT-DUPLICATE initiative in COPD and asthma.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with comorbid insomnia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Developing and validating prediction models for severe exacerbations and readmissions in patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbation (SERCO) in China: a prospective observational study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Trends and Rural-Urban Differences in the Initial Prescription of Low-Value Inhaled Corticosteroids among U.S. Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Can markers of disease severity improve the predictive power of claims-based multimorbidity indices?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- IMplementing Predictive Analytics towards efficient COPD Treatments (IMPACT): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized impact study.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2023Article
- Prediction of 30-day risk of acute exacerbation of readmission in elderly patients with COPD based on support vector machine model.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Automatically Explaining Machine Learning Predictions on Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Developing a Machine Learning Model to Predict Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Using Computational Methods to Improve Integrated Disease Management for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Secondary Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Predicting Hospitalization Due to COPD Exacerbations in Swedish Primary Care Patients Using Machine Learning - Based on the ARCTIC Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArticle
- Predictive modeling of COPD exacerbation rates using baseline risk factors.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
- Predicting Re-Exacerbation Timing and Understanding Prolonged Exacerbations: An Analysis of Patients with COPD in the ECLIPSE Cohort.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with COPD often experience severe exacerbations involving hospitalization, which accelerate lung function decline and reduce quality of life. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to identify patients at risk of developing severe COPD exacerbations using administrative claims data, to facilitate appropriate disease management programs. Methods: A predictive model was developed using a retrospective cohort of COPD patients aged 55-89 years identified between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013 using Humana's claims data. The baseline period was 12 months postdiagnosis, and the prediction period covered months 12-24. Patients with and without severe exacerbations in the prediction period were compared to identify characteristics associated with severe COPD exacerbations. Models were developed using stepwise logistic regression, and a final model was chosen to optimize sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative PV (NPV). Results: Of 45,722 patients, 5,317 had severe exacerbations in the prediction period. Patients with severe exacerbations had significantly higher comorbidity burden, use of respiratory medications, and tobacco-cessation counseling compared to those without severe exacerbations in the baseline period. The predictive model included 29 variables that were significantly associated with severe exacerbations. The strongest predictors were prior severe exacerbations and higher Deyo-Charlson comorbidity score (OR 1.50 and 1.47, respectively). The best-performing predictive model had an area under the curve of 0.77. A receiver operating characteristic cutoff of 0.4 was chosen to optimize PPV, and the model had sensitivity of 17%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 48%, and NPV of 90%. Conclusion: This study found that of every two patients identified by the predictive model to be at risk of severe exacerbation, one patient may have a severe exacerbation. Once at-risk patients are identified, appropriate maintenance medication, implementation of disease-management programs, and education may prevent future exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.