Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022818›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2018

Development and validation of a predictive model to identify patients at risk of severe COPD exacerbations using administrative claims data.

Srinivas Annavarapu, Seth Goldfarb, Melissa Gelb, Chad Moretz, Andrew Renda, Shuchita Kaila

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Srinivas AnnavarapuComprehensive Health Insights, Louisville, KY, srinivas.annavarapu@gmail.com.
Seth GoldfarbComprehensive Health Insights, Louisville, KY, srinivas.annavarapu@gmail.com.
Melissa GelbBoehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT.
Chad MoretzComprehensive Health Insights, Louisville, KY, srinivas.annavarapu@gmail.com.
Andrew RendaHumana, Louisville, KY, USA.
Shuchita KailaBoehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT.
Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USHumana (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with COPD often experience severe exacerbations involving hospitalization, which accelerate lung function decline and reduce quality of life. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to identify patients at risk of developing severe COPD exacerbations using administrative claims data, to facilitate appropriate disease management programs. Methods: A predictive model was developed using a retrospective cohort of COPD patients aged 55-89 years identified between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013 using Humana's claims data. The baseline period was 12 months postdiagnosis, and the prediction period covered months 12-24. Patients with and without severe exacerbations in the prediction period were compared to identify characteristics associated with severe COPD exacerbations. Models were developed using stepwise logistic regression, and a final model was chosen to optimize sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative PV (NPV). Results: Of 45,722 patients, 5,317 had severe exacerbations in the prediction period. Patients with severe exacerbations had significantly higher comorbidity burden, use of respiratory medications, and tobacco-cessation counseling compared to those without severe exacerbations in the baseline period. The predictive model included 29 variables that were significantly associated with severe exacerbations. The strongest predictors were prior severe exacerbations and higher Deyo-Charlson comorbidity score (OR 1.50 and 1.47, respectively). The best-performing predictive model had an area under the curve of 0.77. A receiver operating characteristic cutoff of 0.4 was chosen to optimize PPV, and the model had sensitivity of 17%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 48%, and NPV of 90%. Conclusion: This study found that of every two patients identified by the predictive model to be at risk of severe exacerbation, one patient may have a severe exacerbation. Once at-risk patients are identified, appropriate maintenance medication, implementation of disease-management programs, and education may prevent future exacerbations.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAgedAged, 80 and overBronchitis, ChronicDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary EmphysemaQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityCOPD risk factorsMedicareobservational study

Identifiers

PMID30022818
PMCPMC6045902
OpenAlexW2857050574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.