Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022637›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Efficacy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy for gynecologic cancers: a phase II study by the West Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group (WJGOG 131).

Shin Nishio, Satomi Aihara, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Akira Fujishita, Shuichi Taniguchi, Toru Hachisuga, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Fumihiro Murakami, Fumitaka Numa and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Shin NishioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan. shinshin@med.kurume-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2526-630X
Satomi AiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-9938
Mototsugu ShimokawaClinical Research Institute, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akira FujishitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6472-1291
Shuichi TaniguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miyazaki Prefectural Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-8674
Toru HachisugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-2538
Shintaro YanazumeDepartment of Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Kagoshima Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-2189
Fumihiro MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Kurume, Japan.
Fumitaka NumaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, Shunan, Japan.
Kohei KoteraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagasaki Harbor Medical Center City Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Naofumi OkuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHO Kokura Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Naoyuki TokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Masatoshi YokoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Kimio UshijimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-8873
Kurume University · JPSaga University · JPKagoshima University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPKyushu Rosai Hospital · JPMiyazaki Prefectural Hospital · JPNagasaki Ajisai Hospital · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPSt Mary's Hospital · JPTokuyama (Japan) · JPUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePalonosetron is effective for the management of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). While emetogenic carboplatin-based chemotherapy is widely used to treat gynecologic cancers, few studies have evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness of palonosetron in this setting.

methodsA multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of palonosetron in controlling CINV in patients with gynecologic cancer. Chemotherapy-naïve patients received intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg/body) and dexamethasone before the infusion of carboplatin-based chemotherapy on day 1. Dexamethasone was administered (orally or intravenously) on days 2-3. The incidence and severity of CINV were evaluated using the patient-completed Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool and treatment diaries. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing complete control (CC) of vomiting, with "no rescue antiemetic medication" and "no clinically significant nausea" or "only mild nausea" in the delayed phase (24-120 hours post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR: "no vomiting" and "no rescue antiemetic medication") in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and overall (0-120 hours) phases, and CC in the acute and overall phases.

resultsEfficacy was assessable in 77 of 80 patients recruited. In the acute and delayed phases, the CR rates the primary endpoint, were 71.4% and 59.7% and the CC rates, the secondary endpoint, were 97.4% and 96.1%, respectively.

conclusionWhile palonosetron effectively controls acute CINV, additional antiemetic management is warranted in the delayed phase after carboplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients (Trial registry at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012806).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinDexamethasoneDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMiddle AgedNauseaPalonosetronSeverity of Illness IndexVomitingAntiemeticsCarboplatinDexamethasonePalonosetronCarboplatinGynecologic NeoplasmNauseaPalonosetronVomiting

Identifiers

PMID30022637
PMCPMC6078893
OpenAlexW2804805355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.