ArticleArthritis care & research2019
Daily Pain Measurements and Retrospective Pain Measurements in Hip Osteoarthritis Patients With Intermittent Pain.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06415461 (A Phase 1, Open Label Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Preliminary Efficacy, and Dose Effect of CFL001 Cord Blood Product in Patients With Symptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Open Label Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Preliminary Efficacy, and Dose Effect of CFL001 Cord Blood Product in Patients With Symptomatic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Restoration of sensory feedback from the foot and reduction of phantom limb pain via closed-loop spinal cord stimulation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Daily Diary Instructional Phrases on Respondents' Recall Time Frames: Survey Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the value of daily pain measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA), and whether the reliability of retrospective measurements was lower in patients with intermittent pain than in patients with more constant pain.
methodsWe used data from a randomized controlled trial that investigated the effectiveness of general practitioner care plus exercise therapy in 203 patients with hip OA. During the first 6 weeks, patients scored their pain each day. These daily measurements were available for 185 patients. At 6-week follow-up, patients filled in a questionnaire rating their pain during the previous week. We examined whether the daily measurements provided results for pain other than those provided by retrospective measurements, using a linear mixed-effects model. We also explored differences between subgroups, based on the frequency and severity of intermittent pain, during the pain course and reliability between retrospective measurements and daily measurements.
resultsDaily measurements showed no different effect of exercise therapy on pain compared with retrospective measurements. We found statistical differences (by analysis of variance) during the course of pain between the subgroups based on the intensity of intermittent pain. Reliability between retrospective and daily measurements was lower in the subgroup with severe intermittent pain (Cronbach's α = 0.642) than in other subgroups (Cronbach's α >0.843).
conclusionIn this specific trial, daily measurements did not yield more precise or additional information compared with retrospective measurements at the 6-week follow-up. However, reliability of retrospective measurements may be lower in patients with a higher intensity of intermittent pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.