ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019
Cerebellar Structural Variations in Subjects with Different Hypnotizability.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypnotizability and Time Reproduction.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- No Association Between Hypnotizability and Basal Ganglia Morphometry.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Interplay between cognitive conditions and individual traits in voluntary apnea.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Psychological and neuro-morphological predictors of resilience in healthy adults: the whole is more than the sum of its parts.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- The Role of Interoceptive Sensitivity and Hypnotizability in Motor Imagery.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Brain Functional Correlates of Resting Hypnosis and Hypnotizability: A Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Physiological Correlates of Hypnotizability: Hypnotic Behaviour and Prognostic Role in Medicine.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Hypnotisability and the Cerebellum: Hypotheses and Perspectives.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Review
- Cerebellar engagement in the attachment behavioral system.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Is hypnotic assessment relevant to neurology?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Review
- Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects with Different Hypnotizability Scores.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Cerebellum, Embodied Emotions, and Psychological Traits.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Heartbeat-Evoked Cortical Potential during Sleep and Interoceptive Sensitivity: A Matter of Hypnotizability.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Macro- and micro-structural cerebellar and cortical characteristics of cognitive empathy towards fictional characters in healthy individuals.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Linear and non linear measures of pupil size as a function of hypnotizability.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The effects of the general anesthetic sevoflurane on neurotransmission: an experimental and computational study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Individual Traits and Pain Treatment: The Case of Hypnotizability.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Association of hypnotizability and deep sleep: any role for interoceptive sensibility?Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter?Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- Complex Role of Hypnotizability in the Cognitive Control of Pain.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypnotizability-the proneness to accept suggestions and behave accordingly-has a number of physiological and behavioral correlates (postural, visuomotor, and pain control) which suggest a possible involvement of cerebellar function and/or structure. The present study was aimed at investigating the association between cerebellar macro- or micro-structural variations (analyzed through a voxel-based morphometry and a diffusion tensor imaging approach) and hypnotic susceptibility. We also estimated morphometric variations of cerebral gray matter structures, to support current evidence of hypnotizability-related differences in some cerebral areas. High (highs, N = 12), and low (lows, N = 37) hypnotizable healthy participants (according to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form A) were submitted to a high field (3 T) magnetic resonance imaging protocol. In comparison to lows, highs showed smaller gray matter volumes in left cerebellar lobules IV/V and VI at uncorrected level, with the results in left lobule IV/V maintained also at corrected level. Highs showed also gray matter volumes smaller than lows in right inferior temporal gyrus, middle and superior orbitofrontal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and supramarginal parietal gyrus, as well as in left gyrus rectus, insula, and middle temporal cortex at uncorrected level. Results of right inferior temporal gyrus survived also at corrected level. Analyses on micro-structural data failed to reveal any significant association. The here found morphological variations allow to extend the traditional cortico-centric view of hypnotizability to the cerebellar regions, suggesting that cerebellar peculiarities may sustain hypnotizability-related differences in sensorimotor integration and emotional control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30022466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.