Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022413›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2018

Effects of Ivabradine on Hemodynamic and Functional Parameters in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Peysh A Patel, Noman Ali, Ashwin Roy, Stuart Pinder, Richard M Cubbon, Mark T Kearney, Klaus K Witte

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peysh A PatelDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK. peysh@doctors.org.uk.
Noman AliDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Ashwin RoyDepartment of Cardiology, Tameside General Hospital, Greater Manchester, UK.
Stuart PinderDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Richard M CubbonDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Mark T KearneyDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Klaus K WitteDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Leeds General Infirmary · GBTameside Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/51/29584British Heart Foundation FS/12/80/29821British Heart Foundation FS/15/9/31092Department of Health HCS DRF-2014-05-006Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIvabradine is licensed as add-on therapy in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), normal sinus rhythm, and suboptimal heart rate (HR) control, but effects are not fully established. This study sought to assess the impact of ivabradine therapy on hemodynamic and functional outcome measures in all patients with LVSD.

methodsMEDLINE (1996-2017), Embase (1996-2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov , and ISI Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing standard medical therapy (SMT) plus ivabradine to SMT alone for patients with LVSD of any severity. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias tool.

resultsEight RCTs with 17,823 patients were included. Add-on use of ivabradine reduced resting HR (mean difference [MD] 10.3 bpm; p < 0.001), improved ejection fraction (EF) (MD 3.6%, p < 0.001), and preserved systolic blood pressure (MD 3.4 mmHg; p = 0.09). Stratified analyses according to severity of LVSD did not influence conferred benefits on HR and EF. Small improvements were noted in exercise tolerance (standardized MD 5.9 s; p = 0.004) and peak oxygen consumption (MD 2.9 ml/kg/min; p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Adjunct therapy with ivabradine in patients with LVSD results in a favorable hemodynamic profile and correlates with improved functional capacity. Benefits appear to be broadly preserved irrespective of baseline EF. This was a meta-analysis of RCTs, though limited by exclusion of post hoc analyses, lack of access to patient level data, and inter-study variability in some baseline characteristics. Further, large-scale RCTs are warranted to evaluate effectiveness of ivabradine in cohorts with non-severe LVSD.

Indexed as

Ventricular Dysfunction, LeftBlood PressureCardiovascular AgentsExercise ToleranceHemodynamicsHumansIvabradineStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular AgentsIvabradineivabradineleft ventricular systolic dysfunctionmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30022413
PMCPMC6108989
OpenAlexW2883985832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.