Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022406›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2019

Renal tumor biopsy: indicators, technique, safety, accuracy results, and impact on treatment decision management.

Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Antonio Finelli, Michael A S Jewett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Management of Small Renal Masses <2 cm: Treatment.European urology open science · 2025
    Article
  7. Development of modified multi-parametric CT algorithms for diagnosing clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in small solid renal masses.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  8. The evolving management of small renal masses.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Utility of Renal Mass Biopsy in Large Renal Masses.Research and reports in urology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaime O Herrera-CaceresDivision of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, 3-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Antonio FinelliDivision of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, 3-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Michael A S JewettDivision of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, 3-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. m.jewett@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextRenal tumor biopsy (RTB), as distinct from the more common renal biopsy for medical renal disease, is an option for patients with renal masses. It is mainly used for small renal masses (SRM) but it may also be indicated for larger masses and even in the presence of metastatic disease. Its main indication in SRM is to avoid intervention for benign kidney tumors but increasingly enables more personalized treatment for kidney cancer patients.

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the most recent literature available for RTB including the indications, the technique and also the possible complications.

resultsThe urological community continues to optimize the indications for RTB. Non-operative treatment modalities, such as active surveillance, ablative modalities, and immunotherapy, may have different results influenced by tumor histology. Continuing concern regarding complications and accuracy and, therefore, the utility of RTB has been addressed. Recent reports support the potential benefit of RTB, safely avoiding a significant number of interventions with good results and minimal complications.

conclusionUrologists should be aware of the benefits of RTB and develop experience with this technique to optimize the results. This diagnostic strategy should be discussed with patients and adopted as it has been with other solid tumors.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesBiopsyBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleCarcinoma, Renal CellCarcinoma, Transitional CellHumansImmunotherapyJehovah's WitnessesKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsActive surveillanceKidney cancerRenal tumor biopsySmall renal mass

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.