Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022399›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2018

Recurrent pericarditis: still idiopathic? The pros and cons of a well-honoured term.

Antonio Brucato, Massimo Imazio, Paul C Cremer, Yehuda Adler, Bernhard Maisch, George Lazaros, Marco Gattorno, Alida L P Caforio, Renzo Marcolongo, Giacomo Emmi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel Treatments in Refractory Recurrent Pericarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Antonio BrucatoInternal Medicine, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Massimo ImazioCardiovascular and Thoracic Department, AOU Città DELLA Salute e della Scienza, University Cardiology, Turin, Italy.
Paul C CremerDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Disease, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Yehuda AdlerThe Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Bernhard MaischFaculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
George LazarosDepartment of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Marco GattornoClinic of Pediatrics and Rheumatology, Unit of Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, "G. Gaslini" Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Alida L P CaforioDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Renzo MarcolongoClinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università, Padua, Italy.
Giacomo EmmiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. giacomaci@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9575-8321
Alberto MartiniClinic of Pediatrics and Rheumatology, Unit of Autoinflammatory Diseases and Immunodeficiencies, "G. Gaslini" Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Allan L KleinDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial Disease, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITPhilipps University of Marburg · DETel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In developed countries, more than 80% of cases of acute pericarditis remain without an established diagnosis after a conventional and standard diagnostic approach. These cases are generally labelled as 'idiopathic', i.e. without a known cause. This lack of information is a matter of concern for both patients and clinicians. Some years ago, this term reflected the state of the art of scientific knowledge on the topic. Advances have changed this point of view, in light of available molecular techniques like polymerase chain reaction able to identify viral cardiotropic agents in pericardial fluid and biopsies. Furthermore, the remarkable efficacy of interleukin-1 antagonists, a therapy targeting the innate immune response, suggests clinical and pathogenic similarity between a proportion of patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis and classical autoinflammatory diseases. So, it seems useful to discuss the pros and cons of using the term "idiopathic" in light of the new knowledge.

Indexed as

Concept FormationRecurrenceHumansPericarditisAnakinraAutoinflammatory diseasesIdiopathic recurrent pericarditisIL-1 antagonistsInnate immune systemPericarditis

Identifiers

PMID30022399
OpenAlexW2884376076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.