Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022381›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2018

The spread of Injectate after ultrasound-guided lateral elbow injection - a cadaveric study.

Jonathan P Evans, Jeremy Metz, Rahul Anaspure, William J Thomas, Andrew King, Vicki A Goodwin, Chris D Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan P EvansRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK. j.evans3@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-1012
Jeremy MetzWellcome Trust Biomedical Informatics Hub, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rahul AnaspureRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
William J ThomasRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Andrew KingRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Vicki A GoodwinNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Chris D SmithRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

British Elbow and Shoulder Society Ltr014PPG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjections into the tendinous portion of the common extensor origin are a common intervention in the treatment of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET). Clinical trials report a heterogeneous selection of injectate volumes and delivery techniques, with systematic reviews finding no clear consensus. The aim of this study was to assess the intratendinous distribution and surrounding tissue contamination of ultrasound-guided injections into the Common Extensor Tendon (CET) of the elbow.

methodsTwenty cadaveric elbows were injected by a Consultant Radiologist under Ultrasound guidance. Elbows were randomised to equal groups of 1 or 3 mls of methylene blue injection, delivered using single shot or fenestrated techniques. Following injection, each cadaver underwent a dry arthroscopy and dissection of superficial tissues. The CET was excised, set and divided into 1 mm sections using microtome. Each slice was photographed and analysed to assess spread and pixel density of injectate in four colour graduations. The cross-sectional area of distribution was calculated and compared between groups.

resultsIn all 20 cadaveric samples, contamination of the joint was noted on arthroscopy and dissection. Injectate spread through over 97% of the cross-sectional area. No differences were found in intratendinous spread of injectate between differing volumes or techniques.

conclusionThis study found that commonly used injection volumes and techniques distribute widely throughout cadaveric CETs. There was no improvement when the volume was increased from 1 to 3 mls or between single shot of fenestrated injection techniques. It should be noted that joint contamination using these techniques and volumes may be inevitable.

Identifiers

PMID30022381
PMCPMC6051955
OpenAlexW2883273493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.