Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022353›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2018

Quantitative performance of

Walter Jentzen, Jinda Phaosricharoen, Benedikt Gomez, Philipp Hetkamp, Vanessa Stebner, Ina Binse, Sonja Kinner, Ken Herrmann, Amir Sabet, James Nagarajah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficiency ofEJNMMI physics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Walter JentzenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Jinda PhaosricharoenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Benedikt GomezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Philipp HetkampDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Vanessa StebnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Ina BinseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Sonja KinnerDepartment of Radiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Amir SabetDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
James NagarajahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany. james.nagarajah@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-0809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), serial

resultsThe avg-ACs (max-ACs within parentheses) of 74 lesions ranged from 0.20 (0.33) to 657 (733) kBq/mL. Excluding two lesions with ACs of approximately 1 kBq/mL, the mean (median) ± standard deviation (range) was - 4% (- 5%) ± 14% (- 28 to 29%) for the avg-AC and - 9% (- 11%) ± 14% (- 33 to 33%) for the max-AC. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients were ≥ 0.97, indicating substantial AC agreement.

conclusionsQuantification of lesions in the neck region using

Indexed as

Differentiated thyroid cancerIodine-124PET/CTPET/MR

Identifiers

PMID30022353
PMCPMC6051951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.