Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022331›Full record

Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2018

Bilateral versus unilateral botulinum toxin injections for chronic anal fissure: a randomised trial.

S A Pilkington, R Bhome, R E Welch, F Ku, C Warden, S Harris, J Hicks, C Richardson, T C Dudding, J S Knight and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S A PilkingtonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
R BhomeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-4939
R E WelchSchool of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
F KuSchool of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
C WardenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
S HarrisPrimary Care and Population Studies Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
J HicksDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
C RichardsonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
T C DuddingDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
J S KnightDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
A T KingDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
A H MirnezamiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
N E BeckDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
P H NicholsDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
K P NugentDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. k.p.nugent@soton.ac.uk.
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotulinum toxin injected into the internal anal sphincter is used in the treatment of chronic anal fissure but there is no standardised technique for its administration. This randomised single centre trial compares bilateral (either side of fissure) to unilateral injection.

methodsParticipants were randomised to receive bilateral (50 + 50 units) or unilateral (100 units) Dysport

resultsBetween October 2008 and April 2012, 100 patients with chronic anal fissure were randomised to receive bilateral or unilateral injections. Injection-related pain was comparable in both groups. There was no difference in healing rate. Initially, there was greater improvement in fissure pain in the bilateral group but at 1 year the unilateral group showed greater improvement. Cleveland Clinic Incontinence score was lower in the unilateral group in the early post-treatment period and global health assessment (EuroQol EQ-VAS) was higher in the unilateral group at 1 year.

conclusionsInjection-related pain was similar in bilateral and unilateral injection groups. Unilateral injection was as effective as bilateral injections in healing and improving fissure pain without any deterioration in continence.

Indexed as

Acetylcholine Release InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalBotulinum Toxins, Type AChronic DiseaseFemaleFissure in AnoHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProcedural PainTreatment OutcomeabobotulinumtoxinAAcetylcholine Release InhibitorsBotulinum Toxins, Type AAnal fistulaBotulinum toxinInjection

Identifiers

PMID30022331
PMCPMC6097731
OpenAlexW2884136575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.