Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022325›Full record

Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019

Noncontact identification of sleep-disturbed breathing from smartphone-recorded sounds validated by polysomnography.

Sanjiv Narayan, Priyanka Shivdare, Tharun Niranjan, Kathryn Williams, Jon Freudman, Ruchir Sehra

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03288376 (SNORE), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03288376 completednot on this map

SNORE (Smartphone Analyses of Nocturnal Obstruction by Respiratory Evaluation) SOUNDS

TypeobservationalSponsorIncyphae, Inc.Ran2015 to 2017Enrolled272ConditionsSleep Apnea, Obstructive, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Real-time prediction of upcoming respiratory events via machine learning using snoring sound signal.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanjiv NarayanResonea Inc., 11445 E Via Linda, Suite 2 # 224, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA. sanjivnarayan@incyphae.com.
Priyanka ShivdareResonea Inc., 11445 E Via Linda, Suite 2 # 224, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Tharun NiranjanResonea Inc., 11445 E Via Linda, Suite 2 # 224, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Kathryn WilliamsMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Jon FreudmanResonea Inc., 11445 E Via Linda, Suite 2 # 224, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Ruchir SehraResonea Inc., 11445 E Via Linda, Suite 2 # 224, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.

Funding

Machine Learned Breath Sound Signatures for Obstructive Sleep ApneaR43DP006418 · DP · RESONEA, INC. · PI SEHRA, RUCHIR · 2018 to 2018
$225k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS R43 DP006418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea by the gold-standard of polysomnography (PSG), or by home sleep testing (HST), requires numerous physical connections to the patient which may restrict use of these tools for early screening. We hypothesized that normal and disturbed breathing may be detected by a consumer smartphone without physical connections to the patient using novel algorithms to analyze ambient sound.

methodsWe studied 91 patients undergoing clinically indicated PSG. Phase I: In a derivation cohort (n = 32), we placed an unmodified Samsung Galaxy S5 without external microphone near the bed to record ambient sounds. We analyzed 12,352 discrete breath/non-breath sounds (386/patient), from which we developed algorithms to remove noise, and detect breaths as envelopes of spectral peaks. Phase II: In a distinct validation cohort (n = 59), we tested the ability of acoustic algorithms to detect AHI < 15 vs AHI > 15 on PSG.

resultsSmartphone-recorded sound analyses detected the presence, absence, and types of breath sound. Phase I: In the derivation cohort, spectral analysis identified breaths and apneas with a c-statistic of 0.91, and loud obstruction sounds with c-statistic of 0.95 on receiver operating characteristic analyses, relative to adjudicated events. Phase II: In the validation cohort, automated acoustic analysis provided a c-statistic of 0.87 compared to whole-night PSG.

conclusionsAmbient sounds recorded from a smartphone during sleep can identify apnea and abnormal breathing verified on PSG. Future studies should determine if this approach may facilitate early screening of SDB to identify at-risk patients for definitive diagnosis and therapy. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT03288376; clinicaltrials.org.

Indexed as

SmartphoneAdultAgedAlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyReference ValuesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSleep Apnea SyndromesAppFourier transformPolysomnographySignal processingSleep apneaSleep-disordered breathingSleep screeningSmartphoneSound

Identifiers

PMID30022325
PMCPMC6534134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.