Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022242›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2019

Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: an investigation with optokinetic stimulation.

Elvio Blini, Marco Pitteri, Marco Zorzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anchoring bias in mental arithmetic.Psychological research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mental Number Representations in 2D Space.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elvio BliniImpAct Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-5763
Marco PitteriNeurology section, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8093-4548
Marco ZorziDepartment of General Psychology and Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy. marco.zorzi@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-6390

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions MSCA-IF-2016-746154Università degli Studi di Padova Strategic Grant "NEURAT"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that mental calculation might involve movements of attention along a spatial representation of numerical magnitude. Addition and subtraction on nonsymbolic numbers (numerosities) seem to induce a "momentum" effect, and have been linked to distinct patterns of neural activity in cortical regions subserving attention and eye movements. We investigated whether mental arithmetic on symbolic numbers, a cornerstone of abstract mathematical reasoning, can be affected by the manipulation of overt spatial attention induced by optokinetic stimulation (OKS). Participants performed additions or subtractions of auditory two-digit numbers during horizontal (experiment 1) or vertical OKS (experiment 2), and eye movements were concurrently recorded. In both experiments, the results of addition problems were underestimated, whereas results of subtractions were overestimated (a pattern that is opposite to the classic Operational Momentum effect). While this tendency was unaffected by OKS, vertical OKS modulated the occurrence of decade errors during subtractions (i.e., fewer during downward OKS and more frequent during upward OKS). Eye movements, on top of the classic effect induced by OKS, were affected by the type of operation during the calculation phase, with subtraction consistently leading to a downward shift of gaze position and addition leading to an upward shift. These results highlight the pervasive nature of spatial processing in mental arithmetic. Furthermore, the preeminent effect of vertical OKS is in line with the hypothesis that the vertical dimension of space-number associations is grounded in universal (physical) constraints and, thereby, more robust than situated and culture-dependent associations with the horizontal dimension.

Indexed as

Spatial ProcessingSymbolismAdultAttentionEye MovementsFemaleHumansItalyMaleMathematicsPhotic StimulationProblem SolvingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30022242
PMCPMC6373542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.