Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022115›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Label-free multiphoton microscopy reveals relevant tissue changes induced by alginate hydrogel implantation in rat spinal cord injury.

Roberta Galli, Kerim H Sitoci-Ficici, Ortrud Uckermann, Robert Later, Magda Marečková, Maria Koch, Elke Leipnitz, Gabriele Schackert, Edmund Koch, Michael Gelinsky and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Brain & spine · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta GalliClinical Sensoring and Monitoring - Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Kerim H Sitoci-FiciciMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Ortrud UckermannMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Robert LaterMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Magda MarečkováMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Maria KochMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Elke LeipnitzMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Gabriele SchackertMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Edmund KochClinical Sensoring and Monitoring - Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Michael GelinskyCentre for Translational Bone, Joint and Soft Tissue Research, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-5121
Gerald SteinerClinical Sensoring and Monitoring - Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Gerald.Steiner@tu-dresden.de.
Matthias KirschMolecular Neuroimaging Laboratory, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Matthias.Kirsch@tu-dresden.de.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 13N13807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of therapies promoting recovery after spinal cord injury is a challenge. Alginate hydrogels offer the possibility to develop biocompatible implants with mechanical properties tailored to the nervous tissue, which could provide a permissive environment for tissue repair. Here, the effects of non-functionalized soft calcium alginate hydrogel were investigated in a rat model of thoracic spinal cord hemisection and compared to lesioned untreated controls. Open field locomotion tests were employed to evaluate functional recovery. Tissue analysis was performed with label-free multiphoton microscopy using a multimodal approach that combines coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering to visualize axonal structures, two-photon fluorescence to visualize inflammation, second harmonic generation to visualize collagenous scarring. Treated animals recovered hindlimb function significantly better than controls. Multiphoton microscopy revealed that the implant influenced the injury-induced tissue response, leading to decreased inflammation, reduced scarring with different morphology and increased presence of axons. Demyelination of contralateral white matter near the lesion was prevented. Reduced chronic inflammation and increased amount of axons in the lesion correlated with improved hindlimb functions, being thus relevant for locomotion recovery. In conclusion, non-functionalized hydrogel improved functional outcome after spinal cord injury in rats. Furthermore, label-free multiphoton microscopy qualified as suitable technique for regeneration studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAlginatesAnimalsFemaleHydrogelsLocomotionMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonRatsRats, WistarRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesAlginatesHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID30022115
PMCPMC6052076
OpenAlexW2872394600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.