Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022087›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

A dual-fMRI investigation of the iterated Ultimatum Game reveals that reciprocal behaviour is associated with neural alignment.

Daniel J Shaw, Kristína Czekóová, Rostislav Staněk, Radek Mareček, Tomáš Urbánek, Jiří Špalek, Lenka Kopečková, Jan Řezáč, Milan Brázdil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Altered Patterns of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Underpin Reduced Expressions of Social-Emotional Reciprocity in Autistic Adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Substantial Heritability Underlies Fairness Norm Adaptation Capability and its Neural Basis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel J ShawDepartment of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, United Kingdom. d.j.shaw@aston.ac.uk.
Kristína CzekóováCEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Rostislav StaněkDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radek MarečekCEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš UrbánekInstitute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiří ŠpalekDepartment of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-4946
Lenka KopečkováDepartment of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan ŘezáčDepartment of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan BrázdilCEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic) GA16-18261S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyadic interactions often involve a dynamic process of mutual reciprocity; to steer a series of exchanges towards a desired outcome, both interactants must adapt their own behaviour according to that of their interaction partner. Understanding the brain processes behind such bidirectional reciprocity is therefore central to social neuroscience, but this requires measurement of both individuals' brains during real-world exchanges. We achieved this by performing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on pairs of male individuals simultaneously while they interacted in a modified iterated Ultimatum Game (iUG). In this modification, both players could express their intent and maximise their own monetary gain by reciprocating their partner's behaviour - they could promote generosity through cooperation and/or discourage unfair play with retaliation. By developing a novel model of reciprocity adapted from behavioural economics, we then show that each player's choices can be predicted accurately by estimating expected utility (EU) not only in terms of immediate payoff, but also as a reaction to their opponent's prior behaviour. Finally, for the first time we reveal that brain signals implicated in social decision making are modulated by these estimates of EU, and become correlated more strongly between interacting players who reciprocate one another.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEconomics, BehavioralGame TheoryInterpersonal RelationsAdultBrainBrain MappingCooperative BehaviorHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30022087
PMCPMC6051991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.