ArticleScientific reports2018
Scalable photonic reinforcement learning by time-division multiplexing of laser chaos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conflict-free joint decision by lag and zero-lag synchronization in laser network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Harnessing microcomb-based parallel chaos for random number generation and optical decision making.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Efficient dynamic channel assignment through laser chaos: a multiuser parallel processing learning algorithm.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Controlling chaotic itinerancy in laser dynamics for reinforcement learning.Science advances · 2022Article
- Decision making for large-scale multi-armed bandit problems using bias control of chaotic temporal waveforms in semiconductor lasers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Arm order recognition in multi-armed bandit problem with laser chaos time series.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Entangled N-photon states for fair and optimal social decision making.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Generative adversarial network based on chaotic time series.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Entangled-photon decision maker.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- On-chip photonic decision maker using spontaneous mode switching in a ring laser.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reinforcement learning involves decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments and constitutes a crucial element of artificial intelligence. In our previous work, we experimentally demonstrated that the ultrafast chaotic oscillatory dynamics of lasers can be used to efficiently solve the two-armed bandit problem, which requires decision-making concerning a class of difficult trade-offs called the exploration-exploitation dilemma. However, only two selections were employed in that research; hence, the scalability of the laser-chaos-based reinforcement learning should be clarified. In this study, we demonstrated a scalable, pipelined principle of resolving the multi-armed bandit problem by introducing time-division multiplexing of chaotically oscillated ultrafast time series. The experimental demonstrations in which bandit problems with up to 64 arms were successfully solved are presented where laser chaos time series significantly outperforms quasiperiodic signals, computer-generated pseudorandom numbers, and coloured noise. Detailed analyses are also provided that include performance comparisons among laser chaos signals generated in different physical conditions, which coincide with the diffusivity inherent in the time series. This study paves the way for ultrafast reinforcement learning by taking advantage of the ultrahigh bandwidths of light wave and practical enabling technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.