Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30022075›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Ranking genome-wide correlation measurements improves microarray and RNA-seq based global and targeted co-expression networks.

Franziska Liesecke, Dimitri Daudu, Rodolphe Dugé de Bernonville, Sébastien Besseau, Marc Clastre, Vincent Courdavault, Johan-Owen de Craene, Joel Crèche, Nathalie Giglioli-Guivarc'h, Gaëlle Glévarec and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Inferring Gene Networks from High-Throughput Transcriptomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NetREx: Network-based Rice Expression Analysis Server for abiotic stress conditions.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Organoid technology for personalized pancreatic cancer therapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Franziska LieseckeUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Dimitri DauduUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Rodolphe Dugé de BernonvilleUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Sébastien BesseauUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Marc ClastreUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Vincent CourdavaultUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-4532
Johan-Owen de CraeneUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9654-2143
Joel CrècheUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Nathalie Giglioli-Guivarc'hUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Gaëlle GlévarecUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Olivier PichonUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France.
Thomas Dugé de BernonvilleUniversité de Tours, EA2106 Biomolécules et Biotechnologies végétales, Tours, 37200, France. thomas.duge@univ-tours.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-2886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-expression networks are essential tools to infer biological associations between gene products and predict gene annotation. Global networks can be analyzed at the transcriptome-wide scale or after querying them with a set of guide genes to capture the transcriptional landscape of a given pathway in a process named Pathway Level Coexpression (PLC). A critical step in network construction remains the definition of gene co-expression. In the present work, we compared how Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), Spearman Correlation Coefficient (SCC), their respective ranked values (Highest Reciprocal Rank (HRR)), Mutual Information (MI) and Partial Correlations (PC) performed on global networks and PLCs. This evaluation was conducted on the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana using microarray and differently pre-processed RNA-seq datasets. We particularly evaluated how dataset × distance measurement combinations performed in 5 PLCs corresponding to 4 well described plant metabolic pathways (phenylpropanoid, carbohydrate, fatty acid and terpene metabolisms) and the cytokinin signaling pathway. Our present work highlights how PCC ranked with HRR is better suited for global network construction and PLC with microarray and RNA-seq data than other distance methods, especially to cluster genes in partitions similar to biological subpathways.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, PlantArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeArabidopsis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30022075
PMCPMC6052111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.