Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021711›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2018

The Association Between Increased Levels of Patient Engagement With an Internet Support Group and Improved Mental Health Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up: Post-Hoc Analyses From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Emily M Geramita, Bea Herbeck Belnap, Kaleab Z Abebe, Scott D Rothenberger, Armando J Rotondi, Bruce L Rollman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01482806 (Online Treatments for Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01482806 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Online Treatments for Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2012 to 2017Enrolled700ConditionsDepression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic DisorderArmsCCBT+ISG/Collaborative Care, CCBT/Collaborative Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily M GeramitaDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-4950
Bea Herbeck BelnapDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-9896
Kaleab Z AbebeDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3644-8419
Scott D RothenbergerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8300-5947
Armando J RotondiCenter for Behavioral Health and Smart Technology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7529-6753
Bruce L RollmanCenter for Behavioral Health and Smart Technology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-7464
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Online Treatments for Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary CareR01MH093501 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ROLLMAN, BRUCE LAWRENCE · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000145 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$872k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000145NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe recently reported that depressed and anxious primary care patients randomized to a moderated internet support group (ISG) plus computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) did not experience improvements in depression and anxiety over cCBT alone at 6-month follow-up.

objectiveThe 1% rule posits that 1% of participants in online communities generate approximately 90% of new user-created content. The aims of this study were to apply the 1% rule to categorize patient engagement with the ISG and identify whether any patient subgroups benefitted from ISG use.

methodsWe categorized the 302 patients randomized to the ISG as: superusers (3/302, 1.0%), top contributors (30/302, 9.9%), contributors (108/302, 35.8%), observers (87/302, 28.8%) and those who never logged in (74/302, 24.5%). We then applied linear mixed models to examine associations between engagement and 6-month changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Short Form Health Survey Mental Health Component, SF-12 MCS) and depression and anxiety symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, PROMIS).

resultsAt baseline, participant mean age was 42.6 years, 81.1% (245/302) were female, and mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and SF-12 MCS scores were 13.4, 12.6, and 31.7, respectively. Of the 75.5% (228/302) who logged in, 61.8 % (141/228) created ≥1 post (median 1, interquartile range, IQR 0-5); superusers created 42.3 % (630/1488) of posts (median 246, IQR 78-306), top contributors created 34.6% (515/1488; median 11, IQR 10-18), and contributors created 23.1 % (343/1488; median 3, IQR 1-5). Compared to participants who never logged in, the combined superuser + top contributor subgroup (n=33) reported 6-month improvements in anxiety (PROMIS: -11.6 vs -7.8; P=.04) and HRQoL (SF-12 MCS: 16.1 vs 10.1; P=.01) but not in depression. No other subgroup reported significant symptom improvements.

conclusionsPatient engagement with the ISG was more broadly distributed than predicted by the 1% rule. The 11% of participants with the highest engagement levels reported significant improvements in anxiety and HRQoL.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01482806; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01482806 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/708Bjlge9).

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMaleMental HealthPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeSelf-Help GroupsTime Factorsanxietydepressioninternet support grouppatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID30021711
PMCPMC6068384
OpenAlexW2803655916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.