Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021612›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2018

Influence of the load exerted over a forearm crutch in spatiotemporal step parameters during assisted gait: pilot study.

Carmen Ridao-Fernández, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Joaquín Ojeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmen Ridao-FernándezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Research Group "Area of Physiotherapy CTS-305", University of Seville, C/Avicena s/n, C.P. 41009, Seville, Spain. mcrf.2817@gmail.com.
Gema Chamorro-MorianaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Research Group "Area of Physiotherapy CTS-305", University of Seville, C/Avicena s/n, C.P. 41009, Seville, Spain.
Joaquín OjedaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacture, Research Group "Mechanical Engineering", University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Universidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) DPI2013-44371-PMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) DPI2016-80796-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted gait with forearm crutches is frequently performed during the recovery of musculoskeletal injuries of the lower limb. The amount of body weight applied to the crutch or crutches depends on the pathology and the treatment phase. The transition from assisted gait with two crutches to a single crutch is usually recommended when the subject is able to load the 50% of the body weight upon the affected member. An altered assisted gait will cause biomechanic alterations and, therefore, longer treatments and relapses. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of 10, 25 and 50% of body weight applied to a forearm crutch during a unilateral assisted gait in the spatial and temporal step parameters to determine the load that produces alterations in gait biomechanics and the load that does not.

methodsEleven healthy subjects performed normal gait (NG) and assisted gait with a forearm crutch, in which the applied loads were: comfortable (C), 25 and 50% of their body weight. Vicon System was employed for gait recording. GCH System 2.0 and GCH Control Software 1.0 controlled the loads. The variables were: step length, step period, velocity, step width and step angle. Friedman test compared all the gait modalities: NG and the different loads. Wilcoxon signed-rank test analyzed ipsilateral and contralateral step parameters to the crutch globally and for each subject.

resultsFriedman test showed significant differences between NG, C, 25 and 50%, especially for step period and velocity. Wilcoxon test had significant differences only in 4 of the 20 general comparisons between ipsilateral and contralateral steps to the crutch. In the analysis by subjects, step length, step period and velocity showed 79/132, 110/132 and 58/66 significant differences, respectively.

conclusionsThe increase in the load exerted over a forearm crutch produced an increase in the step period, accompanied by a reduction of step length and gait velocity. Step width and step angle were not modified. The unloading of 25 and 50% of body weight on a single crutch is incorrect from the biomechanical point of view. Two crutches should be employed when the body weight to unload exceeds 10%.

Indexed as

CrutchesForearmGaitSpatio-Temporal AnalysisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsWeight-BearingYoung AdultAssisted walkingForearm crutchesLoadStep parameters

Identifiers

PMID30021612
PMCPMC6052579
OpenAlexW2884965804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.