Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021565›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Impact of obesity and other risk factors on labor dystocia in term primiparous women: a case control study.

Tuija Hautakangas, Outi Palomäki, Karoliina Eidstø, Heini Huhtala, Jukka Uotila

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of premature rupture of membranes on the peripartum outcomes in vaginally intended breech deliveries at term: A FRABAT study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Parturition in Mammals: Animal Models, Pain and Distress.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tuija HautakangasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Keskussairaalantie 19, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland. tuija.hautakangas@ksshp.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-6735
Outi PalomäkiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Karoliina EidstøKangasala Health Center, Kangasala, Finland.
Heini HuhtalaSchool of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jukka UotilaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University Hospital · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPurpose of this study was to investigate differences between primiparous term pregnancies, one leading to vaginal delivery (VD) and the other to acute cesarean section (CS) due to labor dystocia in the first stage of labor. We particularly wanted to assess the influence of body mass index (BMI) on CS risk.

methodsA retrospective case-control study in a tertiary delivery unit with 5200 deliveries annually. Cases were 296 term primiparous women whose intended vaginal labor ended in acute CS because of dystocia. Controls were primiparas with successful vaginal delivery VD (n = 302). The data were retrieved from medical records. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between BMI and covariates on labor dystocia.

resultsIn the cases ending with acute CS, women were older (OR 1.06 [1.03-1.10]), shorter (OR 0.94 [0.91-0.96]) and more often had a chronic disease (OR 1.60 [1.1-2.29]). In this group fetal malposition (OR 42.0 [19.2-91.9]) and chorioamnionitis (OR 10.9 [5.01-23.6]) were more common, labor was less often in an active phase (OR 3.37 [2.38-4.76]) and the cervix was not as well ripened (1.5 vs. 2.5 cm, OR 0.57 [0.48-0.67] on arrival at the birth unit. BMI was higher in the dystocia group (24.1 vs. 22.6 kg/m

conclusionsLabor dystocia is a multifactorial phenomenon in which the possibility to ameliorate the condition via medical treatment is limited. Hospital admission at an advanced stage of labor is recommended. Pre-pregnancy weight control in the population at reproductive age is essential, as a high BMI is strongly associated with labor dystocia.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionDystociaObesityAdultBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansParityPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCase controlCesarean sectionDystociaObesityPrimipara

Identifiers

PMID30021565
PMCPMC6052711
OpenAlexW2884082632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.