Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021558›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2018

Can the health related quality of life measure QOLIBRI- overall scale (OS) be of use after stroke? A validation study.

Guri Heiberg, Synne Garder Pedersen, Oddgeir Friborg, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen, Henriette Stabel Holm, Nicole Steinbüchel von, Cathrine Arntzen, Audny Anke

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03948906 (Comparing Post-stroke Functioning and Rehabilitation Pathways in a Region of North of Norway and a Region of Denmark. A Prospective Cohort Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03948906 unknown statusnot on this map

Comparing Post-stroke Functioning and Rehabilitation Pathways in a Region of North of Norway and a Region of Denmark. A Prospective Cohort Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital of North NorwayRan2014 to 2023Enrolled815ConditionsStroke, Acute
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Self-reported quality of life following stroke: a systematic review of instruments with a focus on their psychometric properties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Redefining a minimal rehabilitation assessment protocol for severe acquired brain injuries.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-5L and the reworded QOLIBRI-OS in the general population of Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guri HeibergDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. guri.heiberg@unn.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9846-9346
Synne Garder PedersenDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Oddgeir FriborgDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, the Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jørgen Feldbæk NielsenHammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henriette Stabel HolmHammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nicole Steinbüchel vonUniversitäty Medicine, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Cathrine ArntzenDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Audny AnkeDepartment of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

Universitetet i Tromsø IN-1096130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that assess both patient-reported functioning and well-being after stroke are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine reliability and validity of one of these measures, the patient-reported Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS), in patients after stroke.

methodsStroke survivors were examined prospectively using survey methods. Core survey data (n = 125) and retest data (n = 36) were obtained at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Item properties (distribution, floor and ceiling effects), psychometric properties (reliability and model fit), and validity (correlations with established measures of anxiety, depression and HRQOL) of the QOLIBRI-OS were examined.

resultsMissing responses on the questionnaire were low (0.5%). All items were positively skewed. No floor effects were present, whereas five out of six items showed ceiling effects. The summary QOLIBRI-OS score exhibited no floor or ceiling effects, and had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α =0.93). All item-total correlations were high (0.73-0.88). The test-retest reliability of single items varied from 0.74 to 0.91 and was 0.93 for the overall score. The confirmatory factor analysis yielded an excellent fit for a five-item version and provided tentative support for the original six-item version. The convergent validity correlations were in the hypothesized directions, thus supporting the construct validity.

conclusionsThe brief QOLIBRI-OS is a valid and reliable brief health-related outcome measure that is appropriate for screening HRQOL in patients after stroke.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesPsychometricsQuality of LifeStrokeHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth related quality of lifeQOLIBRI-OSStrokeValidity

Identifiers

PMID30021558
PMCPMC6052666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.