ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based vs. log-ratio transformation-based methods.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate expression and activity of flocculins underlie the characteristic flocculation phenotype ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- SIEVEseq: unified differential expression, variability, and skewness analyses using RNA-Seq data.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- Benchmarking of methods to analyse data derived from GBS-MeDIP.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Compositional data modeling of high-dimensional single cell RNA-seq (CoDA-hd): its advantages over commonly used normalization approaches.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Robust and adaptive non-parametric tests for detecting general distributional shifts in gene expression.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Explicit Scale Simulation for analysis of RNA-sequencing count data with ALDEx2.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- metaGEENOME: an integrated framework for differential abundance analysis of microbiome data in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Quantifying Transcriptome Turnover on Phylogenies by Modeling Gene Expression as a Binary Trait.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Analyzing the relationship between gene expression and phenotype in space-flown mice using a causal inference machine learning ensemble.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Absolute abundance unveils Basidiobolus as a cross-domain bridge indirectly bolstering gut microbiome homeostasis.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- A benchmark of RNA-seq data normalization methods for transcriptome mapping on human genome-scale metabolic networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Metagenomic Study Reveals Phage-Bacterial Interactome Dynamics in Gut and Oral Microbiota in Pancreatic Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of transcriptomics data analysis pipelines on downstream functional enrichment results.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning decodes soil microbiome's response to drought stress.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Reduced Expression of CLEC4G in Neurons Is Associated with Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Metagenomic analysis of gut microbiome illuminates the mechanisms and evolution of lignocellulose degradation in mangrove herbivorous crabs.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- A statistical simulation model to guide the choices of analytical methods in arrayed CRISPR screen experiments.PloS one · 2024Article
- Statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with application to microbiome cancer research.Gut microbes · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCount data generated by next-generation sequencing assays do not measure absolute transcript abundances. Instead, the data are constrained to an arbitrary "library size" by the sequencing depth of the assay, and typically must be normalized prior to statistical analysis. The constrained nature of these data means one could alternatively use a log-ratio transformation in lieu of normalization, as often done when testing for differential abundance (DA) of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in 16S rRNA data. Therefore, we benchmark how well the ALDEx2 package, a transformation-based DA tool, detects differential expression in high-throughput RNA-sequencing data (RNA-Seq), compared to conventional RNA-Seq methods such as edgeR and DESeq2.
resultsTo evaluate the performance of log-ratio transformation-based tools, we apply the ALDEx2 package to two simulated, and two real, RNA-Seq data sets. One of the latter was previously used to benchmark dozens of conventional RNA-Seq differential expression methods, enabling us to directly compare transformation-based approaches. We show that ALDEx2, widely used in meta-genomics research, identifies differentially expressed genes (and transcripts) from RNA-Seq data with high precision and, given sufficient sample sizes, high recall too (regardless of the alignment and quantification procedure used). Although we show that the choice in log-ratio transformation can affect performance, ALDEx2 has high precision (i.e., few false positives) across all transformations. Finally, we present a novel, iterative log-ratio transformation (now implemented in ALDEx2) that further improves performance in simulations.
conclusionsOur results suggest that log-ratio transformation-based methods can work to measure differential expression from RNA-Seq data, provided that certain assumptions are met. Moreover, these methods have very high precision (i.e., few false positives) in simulations and perform well on real data too. With previously demonstrated applicability to 16S rRNA data, ALDEx2 can thus serve as a single tool for data from multiple sequencing modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.