Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021523›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Contemporary ancestor? Adaptive divergence from standing genetic variation in Pacific marine threespine stickleback.

Matthew R J Morris, Ella Bowles, Brandon E Allen, Heather A Jamniczky, Sean M Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecological speciation in allopatry is rooted in older divergence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mitochondrial volume density and evidence for its role in adaptive divergence in response to thermal tolerance in threespine stickleback.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew R J MorrisDepartment of Biology, Ambrose University, 150 Ambrose Circle SW, Calgary, AB, T3H 0L5, Canada. Matthew.Morris@ambrose.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-0168
Ella BowlesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Brandon E AllenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Heather A JamniczkyMcCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Sean M RogersDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 418249-2012Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant RT735287Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Vanier Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulations that have repeatedly colonized novel environments are useful for studying the role of ecology in adaptive divergence - particularly if some individuals persist in the ancestral habitat. Such "contemporary ancestors" can be used to demonstrate the effects of selection by comparing phenotypic and genetic divergence between the derived population and their extant ancestors. However, evolution and demography in these "contemporary ancestors" can complicate inferences about the source (standing genetic variation, de novo mutation) and pace of adaptive divergence. Marine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) have colonized freshwater environments along the Pacific coast of North America, but have also persisted in the marine environment. To what extent are marine stickleback good proxies of the ancestral condition?

resultsWe sequenced > 5800 variant loci in over 250 marine stickleback from eight locations extending from Alaska to California, and phenotyped them for platedness and body shape. Pairwise F

conclusionsMarine stickleback are structured into phenotypically and genetically distinct populations that have been evolving as freshwater stickleback evolved. This variation complicates their usefulness as proxies of the ancestors of freshwater populations. Lessons from stickleback may be applied to other "contemporary ancestor"-derived population studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyAdaptation, PhysiologicalAlaskaAnimalsAquatic OrganismsBase SequenceCaliforniaFemaleFresh WaterGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenotypeGeographyMalePacific OceanAdaptive radiationEvolutionary genomicsMorphological evolutionNatural selectionNext-generation sequencingPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID30021523
PMCPMC6052716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.