ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018
Divergence times in demosponges (Porifera): first insights from new mitogenomes and the inclusion of fossils in a birth-death clock model.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chemical characterization of CProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- From Sea to Freshwater: Shared and Unique Microbial Traits in Sponge Associated Prokaryotic Communities.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Spongy-looking microfabrics in the earliest named stromatolite represent deep burial alteration and incipient metamorphism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Respiration kinetics and allometric scaling in the demosponge Halichondria panicea.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Estimating the Age of Poorly Dated Fossil Specimens and Deposits Using a Total-Evidence Approach and the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.Systematic biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Cross-phyla protein annotation by structural prediction and alignment.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Phylomitogenomics bolsters the high-level classification of Demospongiae (phylum Porifera).PloS one · 2023Article
- The First Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofGenes · 2022Article
- Cophylogeny and convergence shape holobiont evolution in sponge-microbe symbioses.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- A Soft Spot for Chemistry-Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Cytotoxic Compounds of Two Demosponges (Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Tracing animal genomic evolution with the chromosomal-level assembly of the freshwater sponge Ephydatia muelleri.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A one-billion-year-old multicellular chlorophyte.Nature ecology & evolution · 2020Article
- Genetic analysis confirms the freshwater origin of the endemic Caspian sponges (Demospongiae, Spongillida, Metschnikowiidae).ZooKeys · 2020Article
- Symbiosis, Selection, and Novelty: Freshwater Adaptation in the Unique Sponges of Lake Baikal.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 80% of all described extant sponge species belong to the class Demospongiae. Yet, despite their diversity and importance, accurate divergence times are still unknown for most demosponge clades. The estimation of demosponge divergence time is key to answering fundamental questions on the origin of Demospongiae, their diversification and historical biogeography. Molecular sequence data alone is not informative on an absolute time scale, and therefore needs to be "calibrated" with additional data such as fossils. Here, we calibrate the molecular data with the fossilized birth-death model, which compared to strict node dating, allows for the inclusion of young and old fossils in the analysis of divergence time. We use desma-bearing sponges, a diverse group of demosponges that form rigid skeletons and have a rich and continuous fossil record dating back to the Cambrian (~500 Ma), to date the demosponge radiation and constrain the timing of key evolutionary events, like the transition from marine to freshwater habitats. To infer a dated phylogeny of Demospongiae we assembled the mitochondrial genomes of six desma-bearing demosponges from reduced-representation genomic libraries. The total dataset included 33 complete demosponge mitochondrial genomes and 30 fossils.
resultsOur study supports a Neoproterozoic origin of Demospongiae. Novel age estimates for the split of freshwater and marine sponges dating back to the Carboniferous and the previously assumed recent (~18 Ma) diversification of freshwater sponges is supported. Moreover, we provide detailed age estimates for a possible diversification of Tetractinellidae (~315 Ma), the Astrophorina (~240 Ma), the Spirophorina (~120 Ma) and the family Corallistidae (~188 Ma) all of which are considered as key groups for dating the Demospongiae due to their extraordinary rich and continuous fossil history.
conclusionThis study provides novel insights into the evolution of Demospongiae. Observed discrepancies of our dated phylogeny with their putative first fossil appearance dates are discussed for selected sponge groups. For instance, a Carboniferous origin of the order Tetractinellida seems to be too late, compared to their first appearance in the fossil record in the Middle Cambrian. This would imply that Paleozoic spicule forms are not homologous to post-Paleozoic forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.