Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021506›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

How should we implement collaborative care for older people with depression? A qualitative study using normalisation process theory within the CASPER plus trial.

Anna Kathryn Taylor, Simon Gilbody, Katharine Bosanquet, Karen Overend, Della Bailey, Deborah Foster, Helen Lewis, Carolyn Anne Chew-Graham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Reflections on the use of qualitative research methods: it's not 'fluffy'.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Kathryn TaylorFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Senate House, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK. annaktaylor@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8149-3841
Simon GilbodyMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Katharine BosanquetMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Karen OverendMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Della BaileyMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Deborah FosterMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Helen LewisMental Health and Addictions Research Group (MHARG), Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Carolyn Anne Chew-GrahamResearch Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
University of York · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/57/43
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in older people may have a prevalence as high as 20%, and is associated with physical co-morbidities, loss, and loneliness. It is associated with poorer health outcomes and reduced quality of life, and is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Older people may find it difficult to speak to their GPs about low mood, and GPs may avoid identifying depression due to limited consultation time and referral options for older patients.

methodsA qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial for older people with moderate to severe depression: the CASPER plus Trial (Care for Screen Positive Elders). We interviewed patient participants, GPs, and case managers (CM) to explore patients' and professionals' views on collaborative care developed for older people, and how this model could be implemented at scale. Transcripts were analysed thematically using normalization process theory.

resultsThirty-three interviews were conducted. Across the three data-sets, four main themes were identified based on the main principles of the Normalization Process Theory: understanding of collaborative care, interaction between patients and professionals, liaison between GPs and case managers, and the potential for implementation.

conclusionsA telephone-delivered intervention, incorporating behavioural activation, is acceptable to older people with depression, and is deliverable by case managers. The collaborative care framework makes sense to case managers and has the potential to optimize patient outcomes, but implementation requires integration in day to day general practice. Increasing GPs' understanding of collaborative care might improve liaison and collaboration with case managers, and facilitate the intervention through better support of patients. The CASPER plus model, delivering therapy to older adults with depression by telephone, offers the potential for implementation in a resource-poor health service.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGeneral PracticeTelephoneAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthCase ManagersFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Health QuestionnaireCollaborative careDepressionNormalization process theoryOlder peopleQualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID30021506
PMCPMC6052715
OpenAlexW2884540746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.