Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30021114›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Theoretical Analysis of Stress Distribution and Cell Polarization Surrounding a Model Wound.

Yonit Maroudas-Sacks, Assaf Zemel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yonit Maroudas-SacksInstitute of Dental Sciences and the Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Assaf ZemelInstitute of Dental Sciences and the Fritz Haber Research Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: assaf.zemel@ekmd.huji.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing amount of experimental evidence shows that the local elastic field acting on cells governs their spatial organization and polarity in a tissue. Interestingly, experiments on wound healing reveal a universal formation of thick actomyosin bundles around the margins of epithelial gaps. Although the forces involved in this process have been measured, the mechanisms governing cellular alignment and contractile ring formation are still not fully understood. To theoretically investigate this process, we have carried out a self-consistent calculation of the elastic field that is actively generated around a circular gap in a contractile cell monolayer that is adhered to an elastic substrate, taking into account the responsiveness of actomyosin activity to the locally generated stress. We model actomyosin contractility by a radial distribution of point force dipoles that may alter in magnitude and orientation in response to the local elastic stress. In addition, the model takes into account the forces exerted by leader cells on the margins of the cell monolayer. Our model suggests that the presence of a hole in the center of a contractile cell monolayer creates a mechanical tendency for actomyosin forces to polarize tangentially around the hole margin. In addition, it predicts that this tendency optimizes with substrate rigidity, thickness, and strength of cell adhesion to the substrate. Our calculations support the view that the universal formation of a peripheral contractile ring is a consequence of actomyosin contractility in the bulk and its inherent responsiveness to the local stress.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalBiomechanical PhenomenaCell ShapeCytoskeletonDactinomycinEpitheliumWound HealingDactinomycin

Identifiers

PMID30021114
PMCPMC6051284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.