Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Assessment of CD52 expression in "double-hit" and "double-expressor" lymphomas: Implications for clinical trial eligibility.

Jeffrey W Craig, Michael J Mina, Jennifer L Crombie, Ann S LaCasce, David M Weinstock, Geraldine S Pinkus, Olga Pozdnyakova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey W CraigDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael J MinaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jennifer L CrombieHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ann S LaCasceHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David M WeinstockDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Geraldine S PinkusDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Olga PozdnyakovaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8376-0344
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Double-hit" and "double-expressor" lymphomas represent distinct but overlapping subsets of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The high rates of bone marrow involvement by these lymphomas pose a major therapeutic challenge due to the chemotherapy-resistant nature of the bone marrow microenvironment and the limited utility of rituximab-based salvage regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Preclinical studies utilizing high-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab have recently shown promise in the treatment of intramedullary disease, and a Phase I human trial is now underway. In support of such efforts, here we perform CD52 target validation on a series of double-hit (n = 40) and double-expressor (n = 58) lymphomas using immunohistochemistry. CD52 expression levels varied considerably across samples, however positive staining was observed in 75% of both double-hit and double-expressor lymphomas. Similarly, high levels of CD52 expression were seen in patients whose disease was associated with high-risk clinical features, including primary refractory status (73%), higher IPI score (76%), and bone marrow involvement (74%). CD52 expression was not significantly correlated with diagnostically relevant pathologic features such as morphology, cytogenetic findings or other immunophenotypic features, but was notably present in all cases lacking CD20 expression (n = 6). We propose that CD52 expression status be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to guide eligibility for clinical trial enrollment.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlemtuzumabAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCD52 AntigenCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionAlemtuzumabAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCD52 AntigenCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID30020951
PMCPMC6051601
OpenAlexW2883797865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.