ArticlePloS one2018
Prognostic implication of monocytes in atrial fibrillation: The West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of spironolactone on monocyte subsets in atrial fibrillation: IMPRESS-AF randomised controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Hematological parameters in atrial fibrillation: A literature review.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- CLLAF SCORE-A New Risk Score for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Treatment-Naive CLL Patients Initiating First- and Second-Generation BTK Inhibitor Therapy.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Routinely available inflammation biomarkers to predict stroke and mortality in atrial fibrillation.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
- Article
- The monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Peripheral leukocyte count and risk of bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation taking dabigatran: a real-world study.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesHigh monocyte counts are related to adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease. Their role in prognostication in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We investigated whether monocyte counts are useful as a marker of prognosis in patients with AF.
methodsMonocyte counts were obtained from blood samples in 881 AF patients. Study outcomes were (i) all-cause death; (ii) major adverse cardiovascular events; (iii) stroke, TIA or other systemic embolism (SSE); and (iv) major bleeding.
resultsMedian follow up was 7.2 years; 44% of patients died, 48% developed MACE; 9% had SSE and 5% had major bleeding. On Cox regression, after adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASc score, the highest quartile of monocyte counts (i.e., ≥580 μL vs. other quartiles) was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.05, p<0.001) and MACE (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.28-1.96, p<0.001). Persistent monocyte levels ≥580 per μL during follow up were associated with further increase in risk of death (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10-2.11, p = 0.01) and MACE (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09, p = 0.006). Persistent monocyte levels ≥580 per μL during were associated with a significant increase in major bleeding events (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.36-5.67, p = 0.005, after adjustment for HAS-BLED score).
conclusionHigh monocyte counts independently predict the occurrence of MACE, major bleeding and mortality, but not SSE. Understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms involved would help understand the relationships between monocytes, and adverse thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.