Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of visual search training in children with hemianopia.

Iliya V Ivanov, Stephan Kuester, Manfred MacKeben, Anna Krumm, Manja Haaga, Martin Staudt, Angelika Cordey, Claudia Gehrlich, Peter Martus, Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 14th EUNOS Congress: PORTO, PORTUGAL, 16-19 JUNE 2019.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. [Current possibilities of visual rehabilitation].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iliya V IvanovVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan KuesterVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-567X
Manfred MacKebenThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Anna KrummVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Manja HaagaPediatric Neurology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin StaudtPediatric Neurology, University Children's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Angelika CordeyVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Claudia GehrlichVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Susanne Trauzettel-KlosinskiVision Rehabilitation Research Unit, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the effect of a new computer-based visual search training (VST) that was adapted for children with homonymous hemianopia (HH).

methods22 children with HH (median age 11 years, 8 months: 6y6m-19y2m) trained at home for 15 minutes twice/day, 5 days/week, for 6 weeks. To assess performance before training (T1), directly after training (T2) and 6 weeks after the end of training (T3), we measured search times (STs) during on-screen search (with eye tracking), and in a real life search task. Additional variables analyzed during on-screen search were numbers, amplitudes, and durations of saccades, their directional patterns and the proportional number of saccades into the non-seeing field. The latter was the main variable during free viewing. Sixteen healthy age-matched children, who did not undergo the training, served as comparison group. Quality of Life (QoL)-questionnaires were also applied.

resultsSTs of the patients decreased significantly during the training and all search performance tests. This improvement persisted 6 weeks after the end of the training. Saccade amplitudes increased, total number of saccades to find the target decreased, and the proportional number of saccades to the non-seeing side increased. These changes were maintained at T3. Saccade durations did not change. During free viewing, saccades were equally distributed to both sides before and after training. Patients reported improvements in QoL and activities of daily living. Performance in the healthy children did not change by simply repeating the visual search test.

conclusionsThe improvement in STs in all search tasks, larger and fewer saccades, and an improved search strategy after VST suggests that the children with HH benefited from the training. The maintained improvement at T3 and the improvement in the real life search task indicate that the newly developed search strategy persists and can be applied to everyday life.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultBlindnessChildFemaleHemianopsiaHumansMalePhotic StimulationSurveys and QuestionnairesVision, LowVisual FieldsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30020930
PMCPMC6051578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.