Impact of a spleen registry on optimal post-splenectomy vaccination and care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Asplenia and spleen hypofunction.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
   Review
2. The Impact of Standardized Infectious Diseases Consultation on Postsplenectomy Care and Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022
   Article
3. Prevention of infection in asplenic adult patients by general practitioners in France between 2013 and 2016 : Care for the asplenic patient in general practice.BMC family practice · 2020
   Article
4. Post-splenectomy sepsis: preventative strategies, challenges, and solutions.Infection and drug resistance · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as