Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020418›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Absorption of foliar-applied Zn in sunflower (Helianthus annuus): importance of the cuticle, stomata and trichomes.

Cui Li, Peng Wang, Antony van der Ent, Miaomiao Cheng, Haibo Jiang, Thea Lund Read, Enzo Lombi, Caixian Tang, Martin D de Jonge, Neal W Menzies and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Application of ZnO NPs, SiOPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Response ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cui LiThe University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Peng WangNanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Antony van der EntCentre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Miaomiao ChengLa Trobe University, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Haibo JiangUniversity of Western Australia, Centre for Microscopy, Characterization and Analysis, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Thea Lund ReadUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Enzo LombiUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, Australia.
Caixian TangLa Trobe University, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Martin D de JongeANSTO, Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Neal W MenziesThe University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Peter M KopittkeThe University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The pathways whereby foliar-applied nutrients move across the leaf surface remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to examine the pathways by which foliar-applied Zn moves across the sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaf surface, considering the potential importance of the cuticle, stomata and trichomes. Methods: Using synchrotron-based X-ray florescence microscopy and nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS), the absorption of foliar-applied ZnSO4 and nano-ZnO were studied in sunflower. The speciation of Zn was also examined using synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Key Results: Non-glandular trichomes (NGTs) were particularly important for foliar Zn absorption, with Zn preferentially accumulating within trichomes in ≤15 min. The cuticle was also found to have a role, with Zn appearing to move across the cuticle before accumulating in the walls of the epidermal cells. After 6 h, the total Zn that accumulated in the NGTs was approx. 1.9 times higher than in the cuticular tissues. No marked accumulation of Zn was found within the stomatal cavity, probably indicating a limited contribution of the stomatal pathway. Once absorbed, the Zn accumulated in the walls of the epidermal and the vascular cells, and trichome bases of both leaf sides, with the bundle sheath extensions that connected to the trichomes seemingly facilitating this translocation. Finally, the absorption of nano-ZnO was substantially lower than for ZnSO4, with Zn probably moving across the leaf surface as soluble Zn rather than nanoparticles. Conclusions: In sunflower, both the trichomes and cuticle appear to be important for foliar Zn absorption.

Indexed as

Absorption, PhysiologicalFertilizersHelianthusPlant LeavesPlant StomataTrichomesZincFertilizersZinc

Identifiers

PMID30020418
PMCPMC6344099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.