Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020199›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2018

Atherosclerosis in the single-cell era.

Holger Winkels, Erik Ehinger, Yanal Ghosheh, Dennis Wolf, Klaus Ley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vaccination against Atherosclerosis: Is It Real?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single-Cell Antibody Sequencing in Atherosclerosis Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Holger WinkelsDivision of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Erik EhingerDivision of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Yanal GhoshehDivision of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Dennis WolfDivision of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
Klaus LeyDivision of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA.
La Jolla Institute for Immunology · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Transcriptional GenomicsP01HL088093 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WITZTUM, JOSEPH L. · 2008 to 2018
$26.4M
Project 4: APOB-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells exacerbate atherosclerosisP01HL136275 · NHLBI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI Catherine C Hedrick · 2017 to 2026
$25.5M
Myeloid cell interactions with T cells in atherosclerosisR01HL115232 · NHLBI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI LEY, KLAUS F. · 2012 to 2018
$3.2M
Vaccination with MHC-II restricted ApoB100 peptides to prevent atherosclerosisR01HL121697 · NHLBI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI LEY, KLAUS F. · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
CyTOF Mass CytometerS10OD018499 · OD · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI CROTTY, SHANE P · 2014 to 2014
$802k
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL088093NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL136275NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115232NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121697NIH HHS S10 OD018499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe immune system plays a critical role in the development and modulation of atherosclerosis. New high-parameter technologies, including mass cytometry (CyTOF) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), allow for an encompassing analysis of immune cells. Unexplored marker combinations and transcriptomes can define new immune cell subsets and suggest their functions. Here, we review recent advances describing the immune cells in the artery wall of mice with and without atherosclerosis. We compare technologies and discuss limitations and advantages. RECENT

findingsBoth CyTOF and scRNAseq on leukocytes from digested aortae show 10-30 immune cell subsets. Myeloid, T, B and natural killer cells were confirmed. Although cellular functions can be inferred from RNA-Seq data, some subsets cannot be identified based on current knowledge, suggesting they may be new cell types. CyTOF and scRNAseq each identified four B-cell subsets and three macrophage subsets in the atherosclerotic aorta. Limitations include cell death caused by enzymatic digestion and the limited depth of the scRNAseq transcriptomes. SUMMARY: High-parameter methods are powerful tools for uncovering leukocyte diversity. CyTOF is currently more powerful at discerning leukocyte subsets in the atherosclerotic aorta, whereas scRNAseq provides more insight into their likely functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtherosclerosisHumansPrognosisSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30020199
PMCPMC6314310
OpenAlexW2883020052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.