Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020119›Full record

ArticleBlood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis2018

Evaluation of early musculoskeletal disease in patients with haemophilia: results from an expert consensus.

Axel Seuser, Claudia Djambas Khayat, Claude Negrier, Adly Sabbour, Lily Heijnen

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pain management in hemophilia: expert recommendations.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Axel SeuserPrivate Practice for Prevention, Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics, Bonn, Germany.
Claudia Djambas KhayatHo[Combining Circumflex Accent]tel Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Claude NegrierCentre Re[Combining Acute Accent]gional de Traitement de l'He[Combining Acute Accent]mophilie, Louis Pradel, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Adly SabbourPhysiotherapy Department, Cairo University, Egypt.
Lily HeijnenVan Creveldkliniek, UMC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cairo University · EGHôtel-Dieu de France · LBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Early joint damage in patients with haemarthrosis often escapes diagnosis because of insufficient investigation of biomechanical changes. Arthropathy in haemophilia requires complex assessment with several tools. Considering the increased emphasis on an integrated approach to musculoskeletal (MSK) outcomes, re-evaluation of MSK assessment to address individual patient needs is warranted. To advise on the optimal use of current assessment tools and strategies for tailored MSK evaluation in patients with haemophilia. A panel of experts in haemophilic arthropathy evaluated internationally recognized assessment tools through published literature and personal expertise. Each tool was considered, scored and ranked for their utility in the clinical assessment of MSK damage. Subsequently, a patient evaluation table detailing advice on type and frequency of assessments for different patient populations was constructed. To obtain a complete MSK assessment, multiple tools must be used to ensure each criterion is evaluated. For patients with haemophilia, clinical examination of the joint, disease-specific structure/function scores, and activity/participation scores including quality of life are important, and should be performed on a regular basis according to age and clinical condition. Joint imaging is recommended in the prevention, diagnosis and follow-up of haemophilic arthropathy and should be used in conjunction with joint structure and function scores. An integrated approach to MSK assessment using combinations of tools will allow earlier management of dysfunction and may improve long-term outcomes. This approach could be used in long-term follow-up of all patients independent of age and disease stage, especially in children to prevent arthropathy.

Indexed as

AdultChild, PreschoolEarly DiagnosisHemophilia AHemophilia BHumansJoint DiseasesJointsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusculoskeletal DiseasesPhysical ExaminationQuality of LifeRadiographyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30020119
PMCPMC6125749
OpenAlexW2883795735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.