Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30020019›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Implementation and assessment of vaccination programmes: the importance of vaccination sequence for overall health outcomes.

Ane Bærent Fisker, Sanne Marie Thysen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ane Bærent Fiskera Bandim Health Project, Indepth Network , Apartado , Guinea-Bissau.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8521-0992
Sanne Marie Thysena Bandim Health Project, Indepth Network , Apartado , Guinea-Bissau.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4541-3901
Statens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to their effect on the target infections, accumulating evidence indicates that vaccines have non-specific effects. Live measles vaccine (MV) has beneficial NSEs reducing mortality by more than can be explained by preventing measles infection. In contrast, non-live diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP) has negative NSEs; in spite of protecting against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, it is associated with increased mortality. The most recent vaccine has the strongest effect on child health, and therefore sequence of vaccines is important. There is consistent evidence that DTP with or after MV is associated with increased mortality compared with having MV as the most recent vaccine, but the sequence of vaccines is not considered in the current evaluation and implementation of vaccination programmes. To maximise the impact of current vaccination programmes on child health, increased emphasis should be placed on receiving MV after DTP. Increasing time with live MV as the most recent vaccine through better adherence to the schedule, and modified recommendations for catch-up vaccinations for children who do not follow the recommended schedule are likely to result in improvements in child health.

Indexed as

child mortalityexpanded programme on immunizationsheterologous immunityNon-specific effects of vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30020019
PMCPMC6343624
OpenAlexW2884931916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.