Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30019473›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2019

Neural mechanisms of sensorimotor transformation and action selection.

Rafiq Huda, Michael J Goard, Gerald N Pho, Mriganka Sur

Abstract readBiographyHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafiq HudaPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-9966
Michael J GoardDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Gerald N PhoDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mriganka SurPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE RETINOGENICULATE PATHWAYR01EY007023 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUR, MRIGANKA · 1985 to 2018
$5.6M
Cortical circuits and information flow during memory-guided perceptual decisionsU01NS090473 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SUR, MRIGANKA · 2014 to 2016
$2.4M
Dissection of the neural circuitry of short-term memory in behaving miceR00MH104259 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GOARD, MICHAEL · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Prefrontal circuits for attention and motor planningK99MH112855 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HUDA, RAFIQ · 2017 to 2018
$257k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007023NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH112855NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104259NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ray Guillery made major contributions to our understanding of the development and function of the brain. One of his principal conceptual insights, developed together with Murray Sherman [S.M. Sherman & R.W. Guillery (2001) Exploring the Thalamus. Elsevier, Amstrerdam; S. Sherman & R. Guillery (2006) Exploring the Thalamus and Its Role in Cortical Functioning. Academic Press, New York, NY; S.M. Sherman & R.W. Guillery (2013) Functional Connections of Cortical Areas: A New View from the Thalamus. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and then in his last book (R. Guillery (2017) The Brain as a Tool: A Neuroscientist's Account. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK)], was that the brain is a 'tool' to understand the world. In this view, the brain does not passively process sensory information and use the result to inform motor outputs. Rather, sensory and motor signals are widely broadcast and inextricably linked, with ongoing sensorimotor transformations serving as the basis for interaction with the outside world. Here, we describe recent studies from our laboratory and others which demonstrate this astute framing of the link among sensation, perception, and action postulated by Guillery and others [G. Deco & E.T. Rolls (2005) Prog Neurobiol, 76, 236-256; P. Cisek & J.F. Kalaska (2010) Annu Rev Neurosci, 33, 269-298]. Guillery situated his understanding in the deeply intertwined relationship between the thalamus and cortex, and importantly in the feedback from cortex to thalamus which in turn influences feed-forward drive to cortex [S.M. Sherman & R.W. Guillery (2001) Exploring the Thalamus. Elsevier, Amstrerdam; S. Sherman & R. Guillery (2006) Exploring the Thalamus and Its Role in Cortical Functioning. Academic Press, New York, NY]. We extend these observations to argue that brain mechanisms for sensorimotor transformations involve cortical and subcortical circuits that create internal models as a substrate for action, that a key role of sensory inputs is to update such models, and that a major function of sensorimotor processing underlying cognition is to enable action selection and execution.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBrainDecision MakingHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNeural PathwaysNeurosciencesPsychomotor Performanceattentiondecision-makingevidence accumulation

Identifiers

PMID30019473
PMCPMC7350175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.