Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30019382›Full record

Trial reportPediatric obesity2019

Increased brain and behavioural susceptibility to portion size in children with loss of control eating.

L K English, T D Masterson, S N Fearnbach, M Tanofsky-Kraff, J Fisher, S J Wilson, B J Rolls, K L Keller

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric obesity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L K EnglishDepartment of Nutritional Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
T D MastersonDepartment of Nutritional Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
S N FearnbachBrain and Metabolism Imaging in Chronic Disease, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
M Tanofsky-KraffDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
B J RollsDepartment of Nutritional Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.
K L KellerDepartment of Nutritional Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-7018

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Training in Obesity ResearchT32DK064584 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI CORBY K MARTIN, Christopher D Morrison · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK064584Penn State Social Sciences Research Institute, National Center of Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH UL1TR000127USDA Childhood Obesity Prevention Training Grant 2011670013011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPortion size influences intake (i.e. the portion size effect [PSE]), yet determinants of susceptibility to the PSE are unclear.

objectiveWe tested whether children who reported an episode of loss of control (LOC) eating over the last 3 months would be more susceptible to the PSE and would show differential brain responses to food cues compared with children with no-LOC.

methodsAcross five sessions, children (n = 47; 7-10 years) consumed four test meals at 100%, 133%, 167% and 200% conditions for portion size and completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan while viewing pictures of foods varied by portion size and energy density (ED). Incidence of LOC over the past 3 months was self-reported. Random coefficient models were tested for differences in the shape of the PSE curve by LOC status. A whole-brain analysis was conducted to determine response to food cues during the functional magnetic resonance imaging.

resultsReported LOC (n = 13) compared with no-LOC (n = 34) was associated with increased susceptibility to the PSE, as evidenced by a positive association with the linear slope (P < 0.005), and negative association with the quadratic slope (P < 0.05) of the intake curve. Children who reported LOC compared with no-LOC showed increased activation in the left cerebellum to small relative to large portions (P < 0.01) and right cerebellum to High-ED relative to Low-ED food cues (P < 0.01).

conclusionChildren who reported LOC were more susceptible to the PSE and showed alterations in food-cue processing in the cerebellum, a hindbrain region implicated in satiety signalling.

Indexed as

CuesPortion SizeAnthropometryBrainChildCross-Over StudiesEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleBrainloss of controlneuroimagingportion size

Identifiers

PMID30019382
PMCPMC7086471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.