ReviewThe protein journal2018
Evolutionarily Related Dihydrofolate Reductases Perform Coequal Functions Yet Show Divergence in Their Trajectories.
Review in The protein journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) catalyzes NADPH dependent reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate. It plays a crucial role in the DNA synthesis. The investigation of evolution of DHFR generates immense curiosity. It aids in predicting how the enzyme has adapted to the surroundings of various cell types. In spite of great similarity in the structure of E. coli DHFR and human DHFR, their primary sequences are divergent to a great extent, which is evident in variations in the kinetics mechanism of their catalysis. In presence of physiological levels of ligands, they possess distinct kinetics and different rate limiting steps. We have reviewed the process of their unfolding and refolding, their behaviour in denaturing conditions and in presence of various chaperones. Although there is structural similarity between these two homologous enzymes yet they have established distinct mechanisms to accomplish the coequal functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.