Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30019301›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2018

Genetic characterization of extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates from chicken, cow and swine.

Li Chen, Leyi Wang, Afrah Kamal Yassin, Jilei Zhang, Jiansen Gong, Kezong Qi, Roman R Ganta, Yuanyuan Zhang, Yi Yang, Xiangan Han and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Whole genome sequencing analysis of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producingIranian journal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shiga toxin-producingVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Li ChenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Leyi WangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine and the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Afrah Kamal YassinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Jilei ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Jiansen GongPoultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Kezong QiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pathobiology and Disease Control, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Roman R GantaCenter of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases (CEVBD), Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Yuanyuan ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Yi YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, China.
Xiangan HanShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China. hanxgan@163.com.
Chengming WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. wangche@auburn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-8340

Funding

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project ALA052-1-17026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic determination of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria is very important for diagnosis and treatment, but sometimes this procedure needs further genetic evaluation. Whole-genome sequencing plays a critical role in deciphering and advancing our understanding of bacterial evolution, transmission, and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. In this study, whole-genome sequencing was performed on nineteen clinically extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates from chicken, cows and swine and showing different antimicrobial susceptibility. A total of 44 different genes conferring resistance to 11 classes of antimicrobials were detected in 15 of 19 E. coli isolates (78.9%), and 22 types of plasmids were detected in 15/19 (78.9%) isolates. In addition, whole-genome sequencing of these 19 isolates identified 111 potential virulence factors, and 53 of these VFDB-annotated genes were carried by all these 19 isolates. Twelve different virulence genes were identified while the most frequent ones were gad (glutamate decarboxylase), iss (increased serum survival) and lpfA (long polar fimbriae). All isolates harbored at least one of the virulence genes. The findings from comparative genomic analyses of the 19 diverse E. coli isolates in this study provided insights into molecular basis of the rising multi-drug resistance in E. coli.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceEscherichia coliMLST sequence typePhylogenetic analysisVFDBWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30019301
PMCPMC6049849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.