ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018
Arteriovenous Malformations: Syndrome Identification and Vascular Management.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular treatment of a post-traumatic celiac trunk-portal vein fistula.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Interventional treatment of iliac intraosseous arteriovenous malformation: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Percutaneous n-butyl cyanoacrylate glue embolization combined with arterial embolization for extracranial arteriovenous malformations.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2025Article
- Surviving the Nightmare: Massive Bleeding From Large Intraoral Arteriovenous Malformation During Airway Management for Angioembolization Procedure.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Clinical and imaging features of intraosseous arteriovenous malformations in jaws: a 15-year experience of single centre.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewVascular malformations represent a poorly understood set of conditions that create considerable diagnostic and therapeutic confusion. Historically, extensive surgical resections yielded poor results. More recently, the treatment paradigm has shifted to endovascular therapy such that embolization and sclerotherapy are now considered the first line of treatment. Although there is still a role for traditional surgical techniques, it is now most commonly integrated with endovascular therapies in a hybrid fashion. The goal of this review is to provide a greater understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of vascular malformations. RECENT
findingsVascular malformations can be high-flow (arteriovenous shunting) or low-flow (venous or lymphatic). Clinical presentation and treatment is different for each. Treatment of high-flow lesions must be directed at reducing or eliminating the nidus, usually via super-selective catheterization and embolization. Low-flow lesions are usually treated by direct injection of sclerosing agents under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. The cornerstone of managing patients with vascular malformations is making the proper diagnosis, which is often challenging. Even after a diagnosis is made, therapy itself may be challenging and generate frustration among patients and providers. Frequently, the treatment of vascular malformations is characterized by only slow and incremental improvements without complete lesion eradication. By combining a thorough understanding of the vascular malformation disease process with an array of endovascular techniques, vascular interventionalists may contribute greatly to the care of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.