ReviewDer Pathologe2019
[Revised version of the 4th edition of the WHO classification of malignant lymphomas : What is new?]
Review in Der Pathologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- A proposal of a new periimplant breast pathology classification into 3 types.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The associations between Deltex1 and clinical characteristics of breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Safety and effectiveness of biosimilar of Rituximab CT-P10 in the treatment of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis: the MARBLe study (Mixed cryoglobulinemiA Rituximab BiosimiLar).Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After 8 years, the WHO has now published the updated version of the 4th edition of the classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid tumors. This update provides a conceptual rewrite of existing entities as well as some new provisional entities and categories, particularly among the aggressive B‑cell lymphomas. Important new diagnostic categories include the high-grade B‑cell lymphomas, the large B‑cell lymphoma with IRF4 rearrangement, and the Burkitt-like lymphoma with 11q aberrations. Of particular importance, new concepts concerning the taxonomy and classification of early lymphoid lesions or precursor lesions are included, such as the in situ follicular neoplasia or the in situ mantle cell neoplasia. In addition, the concept of indolent lymphoproliferations, such as breast-implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and the indolent T‑cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, has been strengthened. Finally, diagnostic criteria for existing lymphoma entities have been refined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.