ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
Healthcare Workers: Occupational Health Promotion and Patient Safety.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integral definition and conceptual model of mental health: Proposal from a systematic review of different paradigms.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Pooled it
- Creative strengthening groups as a potential intervention to enhance job satisfaction and reduce levels of burnout in healthcare professionals: results from the randomized controlled trial UPGRADE.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Article
- Protocol of the Nurses' Mental Health Study (NMHS): a nationwide hospital multicentre prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Examining the impact of psychosocial safety climate on working conditions, well-being and safety of healthcare providers: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Disclosing Strain: How Psychosocial Risk Factors Influence Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Healthcare Workers Preceding and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Promoting Healthy Behaviors in Older Adults to Optimize Health-Promoting Lifestyle: An Intervention Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Nurses' well-being during the coronavirus (2019) pandemic: A longitudinal mixed-methods study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health in Pandemic Times: The Predict Role of Psychosocial Risks.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- Knowing Well, Being Well: well-being born of understanding: Supporting Workforce Mental Health During the Pandemic.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- Addressing Workplace Stressors Emerging from the Pandemic.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- Association of Happiness and Nursing Work Environments with Job Crafting among Hospital Nurses in South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Mapping the Scientific Research on Healthcare Workers' Occupational Health: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to explore the relation of work-related risk factors and well-being among healthcare workers and the impact on patient safety, using the Health and Work Survey (INSAT) and Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF). A sample of 361 Portuguese healthcare workers participated in this study. The results indicate some significant work-related risk factors: for emotional well-being, Impossible to express myself (β = -0.977), Not having recognition by superiors (β = -1.028) and Have to simulate good mood and/or empathy (β = -1.007); for social well-being, Exposed to the risk of sexual discrimination (β = -2.088), Career progress is almost impossible (β = -1.518), and Have to hide my emotions (β = -2.307); finally for psychological well-being Exposed to the risk of sexual discrimination (β = -2.153), Career progress is almost impossible (β = -1.377), and Have to simulate good mood and/or empathy (β = -3.201). The results showed high levels of well-being despite the exposure of several risk factors at workplace. Regarding the work-related risk factors, the study showed that most of the participants are exposed to several risk factors at workplace (ranging from environmental risk factors, biological to physical), although psychosocial risk factors (work relations with superiors and colleagues, employment relations, and emotional demands) are the ones that most impact on well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.