ReviewPediatric surgery international2018
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a scientometric analysis of the global research activity and collaborative networks.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- From past to future: bibliometric perspective of international research activity on lateral epicondylitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Global Evolution of Obesity Research in Children and Youths: Setting Priorities for Interventions and Policies.Obesity facts · 2019Pooled it
- Bibliometric analysis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia research models: evolution and insights from the past three decades.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Review
- A bibliometric approach to worldwide scientific production of familial hypophosphataemic rickets in Scopus (2000-2022).Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- From past to future: a comprehensive scientometric perspective of influential studies on pterygium.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The digital transformation and future era: bibliometric view of artificial intelligence application in pediatric surgery.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Understanding Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction From a Scientometric Perspective: How Is the Global Research Activity and Collaboration Going?BioMed research international · 2025Review
- Disruptions in retinoic acid signaling pathway contribute to abnormal lung development in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a therapeutic potential for retinoids to attenuate pulmonary hypoplasia.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- The CDH patient perspective journey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- A successful management of left-sided posterior congenital diaphragmatic hernia of the jejunum, ileum, colon and left kidney: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Global Development of Research on Anorectal Malformations over the Last Five Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020Article
- A proteome signature of umbilical cord serum associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2020Article
- Choledochal malformations: global research, scientific advances and key controversies.Pediatric surgery international · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a growing interest to clinicians and scientists, there is no comprehensive study that examines the global research activity on congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A search strategy for the Web of Science™ database was designed to identify scientific CDH publications. Research output of countries, institutions, individual authors, and collaborative networks was analyzed. Semi-qualitative research measures including citation rate and h-index were assessed. Choropleth mapping and network diagrams were employed to visualize results. A total of 3669 publications were found, originating from 76 countries. The largest number was published by the USA (n = 1250), the UK (n = 279), and Canada (n = 215). The USA combined the highest number of cooperation articles (n = 152), followed by Belgium (n = 115) and the Netherlands (n = 93). The most productive collaborative networks were established between UK/Belgium (n = 53), Belgium/Spain (n = 47), and UK/Spain (n = 34). Canadian publications received the highest average citation rate (22.8), whereas the USA had the highest country-specific h-index (72). Eighty-five (2.3%) articles were published by international multicenter consortiums and national research networks. The most productive institutions and authors were based in North America and Europe. Over the past decades, CDH research has increasingly become multidisciplinary and numerous innovative therapeutic strategies were introduced. CDH-related research has constantly been progressing, involving today many disciplines with main research endeavors concentrating in a few high-income countries. Recent advances in prenatal interventions and regenerative medicine therapy hold the promise of improving CDH outcome in the 21st century. International collaborations and translational research should be strengthened to allow further evolution in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30019129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.