ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2018
Training in Endoscopy.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maximising Efficient Endoscopy Training-Implementation Analysis of a Tool to Improve Endoscopy Training.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- UK endoscopy trainer survey: perspectives on current endoscopy training delivery, experience, barriers and opportunities.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Exploring Endoscopic Competence in Gastroenterology Training: A Simulation-Based Comparative Analysis of GAGES, DOPS, and ACE Assessment Tools.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Fundamentals of Bowel Cancer for Biomedical Engineers.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- A review on model-based and model-free approaches to control soft actuators and their potentials in colonoscopy.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopy in surgery.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- The Impact of a Structured Virtual Reality Simulation Training Curriculum for Novice Endoscopists.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Review
- Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
- Impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy trainees: an international survey.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
- Variation in exposure to endoscopic haemostasis for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding during UK gastroenterology training.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Impact of a national basic skills in colonoscopy course on trainee performance: An interrupted time series analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Impact of a simulation-based induction programme in gastroscopy on trainee outcomes and learning curves.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
- Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewProgress towards the goal of high-quality endoscopy across health economies has been founded on high-quality structured training programmes linked to credentialing practice and ongoing performance monitoring. This review appraises the recent literature on training interventions, which may benefit performance and competency acquisition in novice endoscopy trainees. RECENT
findingsIncreasing data on the learning curves for different endoscopic procedures has highlighted variations in performance amongst trainees. These differences may be dependent on the trainee, trainer and training programme. Evidence of the benefit of knowledge-based training, simulation training, hands-on courses and clinical training is available to inform the planning of ideal training pathway elements. The validation of performance assessment measures and global competency tools now also provides evidence on the effectiveness of training programmes to influence the learning curve. The impact of technological advances and intelligent metrics from national databases is also predicted to drive improvements and efficiencies in training programme design and monitoring of post-training outcomes. Training in endoscopy may be augmented through a series of pre-training and in-training interventions. In conjunction with performance metrics, these evidence-based interventions could be implemented into training pathways to optimise and quality assure training in endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30019105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.